|
Administration |
April 2007: Ninth Circuit Determines Best Management Practices May Be Used Instead of Numerical Limits For Storm Water Discharges San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division, ___F.3d___ 04-17554 & 05-15051 (9th Cir. March 8, 2007) |
October 2006: Ninth Circuit Applies Rapanos and Holds City of Healdsburg’s Wastewater Discharge into Former Mining Pond Subject to Clean Water Act Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, ___F.3d___ 04-15442 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2006) |
April 2006: Environmental Groups Sue to Halt Dredging and Filling along the Santa Clara River Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper et al. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CV06-0881, filed Feb. 14, 2006 (C.D. Cal.) |
March 2005: The New World of State and Local Wetlands Regulation |
January 2005: Sixth Circuit Further Defines ‘Adjacent Wetland’ Jurisdiciton under the Clean Water Act Carabell et al. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al., ___F3d___ 03-1700 (6th Cir. Sept. 27, 2004) |
May 2004: U.S. General Accounting Office Conducts Study Regarding U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Practices in Determining Jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act |
March 2003: Clean Water Act Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States" to Undergo Further Refinement |
March 2001: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Issues Draft Environmental Assessment for Agricultural Program on Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge |
February 2001: Federal: United States Supreme Court Narrows the Federal Government's Authority to Regulate Wetlands Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al ___U.S.___, No. 99-1178, 01 C.D.O.S.269 (Jan. 9, 2001) |
|
|
Ballona Westlands |
|
|
|
Bills and Proposed Legislation |
|
|
|
Bolsa Chica Wetlands |
|
|
|
California Wetland and Riparian Area Protection Policy |
|
|
|
Civil and Criminal Penalties |
|
|
|
Civil Enforcement Actions |
|
|
|
Consent Decrees |
|
|
|
Consultant Liability |
|
|
|
Deep Ripping |
|
|
|
Delta Wetlands Project |
|
|
|
Development |
|
|
|
Dredge and Fill |
April 2006: aaa aaa aaa |
|
|
Dredge and Fill Permits |
April 2007: District Court Rejects Tulloch II Rule—Scope of Corps’ Dredge and Fill Permitting Jurisdiction again Called into Question National Association of Home Builders v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ___F.Supp.2d___ 01-0274 (D. D.C. Jan. 30, 2007) |
February 2007: New Hampshire Supreme Court Affirms Developer’s Right to Proceed in Construction within Wetlands Area Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands Council 2005-578 (N.H. Dec. 19, 2006) |
September 2005: Corps of Engineers’ Issuance of Revised Nation Wide Permits Was ‘Final Agency Action’ Subject to Review under the Administrative Procedure Act National Ass’n of Home Builders, et al. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ___F.3d___ 04-5009 (D.C. Cir. July 29, 2005) |
September 2005: Fifth Circuit Allows Dredge and Fill Permit for Construction of Ship Terminal at Bayport Shipping Channel Off Galveston Bay City of Shoreacres v. Waterworth, ___F.3d___ 04-20527 (5th Cir. Aug. 8, 2005) |
October 2004: Ninth Circuit Finds U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Could Encompass Entirety of Proposed Development Site Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al., ___F.3d___ 02-16156, 02-6263, 02-16355 (9th Cir. Aug. 26, 2004) |
June 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Proposes Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements to Waters Deemed outside Federal Jurisdiction. |
June 2004: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Sentencing for Continuous Discharging of Nonhazardous Pollutants on Wetlands without a Permit. 02-16627 (11th Cir. April 20, 2004). United States v. Perez, ___F.3d___ |
May 2004: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Interprets Clean Water Act to Extend to Irrigation Canals and Ditches |
December 2003: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Draft Water Quality Order on Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Dredged or Fill Discharges |
August/September 2003: Fourth Circuit Interprets U.S. Supreme Court Case on Isolated Wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act United States v. Deaton 332 F.3d 698 (4th Cir. 2003). |
November 2002: D.C. Circuit Holds Relevant Value for a Takings Analysis of Federally Regulated Wetlands Is the Value of the Entire Parcel of Land at Issue, without Adjustment for Inflation Walcek, et al., v. United States, ___F.3d___ Case No. 01-5108 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 11, 2002) |
August 2002: In Arizona, Federal Judge Halts North Phoenix Development Based on Effects of Clean Water Act Permit Save Our Sonoran v. Flowers, et al., ___F.Supp..2d___, Case no. CIV-02-0761-PHX-SRB (D. Az.) |
July 2002: A Peat Mining Company Petitions to the United States Supreme Court to Address EPA's Authority in a State-Administered Wetland Permit Program Under the Clean Water Act Michigan Peat v. United States, (6th Cir. 2001) petition for cert. filed Case No. 011384 (U.S. Mar. 18, 2002). |
March 2002: New, Relaxed Nationwide Permits Become Effective March 18, 2002 |
|
|
General Permits |
|
|
|
Grantor Liability |
|
|
|
Irrigation Canals |
|
|
|
Issolated Waters |
|
|
|
Migratory Bird Rule |
|
|
|
No Net Loss Policy |
|
|
|
Pesticides |
|
|
|
Restoration |
|
|
|
Takings |
|
|
|
Tulloch II Rule |
|
|
|
Wetlands Reserve Program |
|
|