














|
Your path: Home) Archive Page) Subjects) Topics) Water Quality
|
|
1995 Bay Delta Water Quality Contol Plan |
|
|
|
Administration |
July 2009: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Proposed Revisions to the Water Quality Enforcement Policy |
June 2009: Oregon Undergoing Significant Review of Its Water Quality Standards and Toxics Regulation |
June 2009: Chicago Area Waterway Rulemaking Continues Without an End in Sight |
June 2009: Vermont Court Finds State Agency Must Act under the Federal Clean Water Act to Regulate Stormwater Discharges In re Stormwater NPDES Petition (Conservation Law Foundation Appeal) 14-1-07 Vtec (Vt. Envt. Ct 2009) |
May 2009: New Strategies for Injecting Climate Change Analysis into Agency Decision-Making Likely a Washout |
January 2009: The Obama Administration and Water—New Regulations and Infrastructure Funding Expected in 2009 |
December 2008: Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski Proposes ‘Headwaters to Ocean’ Comprehensive Water Strategy |
November 2008: New Tucson Regulations Require Graywater Use and the Harvesting of Rainwater |
November 2008: Maryland Proposes New Poultry Operations Discharge Permit and Regulations |
August 2008: State Water Resources Control Board and Two Regional Water Quality Control Boards Release Strategic Workplan for Delta Estuary |
April 2008: California Water Boards Reissue Draft Strategic Plan Update 2008-2012 |
March 2008: Fourth District Court Removes Procedural Hurdle to Water Quality Litigation Schutte & Koerting, Inc. v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., San Diego Region, ___Cal.App.4th___ D048830 (4th App. Dist. Jan. 16, 2008) |
December 2007: Illinois Undertakes Significant Water Quality Standards Revision for the Chicago Area |
October 2007: Green Infrastructure: A Storm Perfected? |
August 2007: Environmental Groups Sue Central Valley Regional Board Water Quality Control Board over Waivers for Agricultural Discharges California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board—Central Valley, filed June 15, 2007, Sacramento Superior Court |
August 2007: New Mexico Court of Appeals Affirms State’s Water Quality Control Commission’s 2005 Amendment to Water Quality Standard Defining ‘Surface Waters of the State’ New Mexico Mining Association, et al. v. Water Quality Control Commission (N.M. Ct. App. May 10, 2007) |
August 2007: Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board Rejects Vegetation Removal as Mitigation for Groundwater Rights CPM Development Corp. dba ICON Materials v. Ecology PCHB No. 03-071 (Order on Summary Judgment, March 12, 2007) |
July 2007: State Water Resources Control Board Dismisses Petitions for Review of Central Valley Agricultural Waiver |
April 2007: ‘Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act’ Is Introduced in Congress to Address the ‘Great Lakes Regional Collaboration Strategy to Restore and Protect the Great Lakes’ |
February 2007: Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Seeks to Jumpstart Water Quality Standards Rulemaking |
January 2006: Mississippi Gulf Coast Water and Wastewater Resources Plan Has a Half- Billion-Dollar Price Tag |
December 2006: California Water Resources Control Board Issues Proposed Rule Concerning Grants of Stay of the Effect of a Regional Water Quality Control Board |
December 2006: Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Redux?—Commission Completes Report ‘Advice to Governments on Their Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement’ |
November 2006: EPA Promulgates New Rule Regulating Contamination of Drinking Water Drawn from Groundwater (National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Ground Water Rule) 40 CFR Parts 9, 141 and 142 |
October 2006: Supreme Court of Vermont Remands Water Quality Discharge Case to the State Agency for Natural Resources after Finding that the Vermont Water Resources Board Did Not Have Primary Jurisdiction In Re Stormwater NPDES Petition 2004-595 (Vt. Aug. 25, 2006) |
June 2006: California Agricultural Water Quality Regulatory Update: Waiver Programs and Increasing Fees |
May 2005: Water Quality in California’s Central Valley: Seeking an Enforcement Policy for the Future |
September 2004: COLORADO: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: UTAH: Enforcement of Water Penalties |
September 2004: NEVADA: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: WASHINGTON: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: IDAHO: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: TEXAS: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: NEW MEXICO: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: CALIFORNIA: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: OREGON: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
September 2004: ARIZONA: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
August 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Passes Resolution 2004-0035 to Implement the Consolidated Watershed Protection, Watershed Management, Drinking Water Quality, and Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grants. |
December 2003: Governor Davis Approves Bill Granting Regional Water Quality Control Boards Veto Power over Approval of Timber Harvesting Plans |
December 2003: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Draft Water Quality Order on Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Dredged or Fill Discharges |
November 2003: California Court of Appeal Decides Regional Boards Need Not Consider Economic Burdens when Determining Permit Effluent Limitations City of Burbank v. California State Water Resources Control Bd. ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. B150912; City of Los Angeles v. State Water Resources Control Bd., Case Nos. B151175, B152562, consolidated (2nd Dist. Aug. 18, 2003). |
|
|
Agricultural Runoff |
January 2008: Groups Critical of Chesapeake Bay Progress |
November 2007: Central Valley Irrigated Lands Program Update |
August 2007: Environmental Groups Sue Central Valley Regional Board Water Quality Control Board over Waivers for Agricultural Discharges California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board—Central Valley, filed June 15, 2007, Sacramento Superior Court |
April 2007: Federal Plan Advances to Address Salinity Drainage Issues in the Western San Joaquin Valley |
March 2007: Florida Announces Proposed Administrative Rule to Limit Nutrients in Urban Turf and Lawn Fertilizers |
August 2006: Addressing Water Quality in the Agricultural Central Valley: Region 5 Water Quality Control Board Renews Irrigated Lands Program |
February 2006: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Extends Conditional Waiver Program for Runoff from Irrigated Lands |
February 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Holds Workshop to Consider Draft Order Regarding Agricultural Runoff Rules |
1 December 2003: State Water Resources Control Board Stays Requirement for Agricultural Coalitions to File Membership Documents under Agricultural Discharge Waiver. (SWRCB Order WQO 2003-0016, October 28, 2003.) |
November 2003: Water and Wine: Regulation of Vineyard and Winery Development and Operation in California’s North Coast Counties |
October 2003: Agricultural and Environmental Interests File Petition for Review of Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from Irrigated Lands SWRCB/OCC File No. A-1586 and A-1586(a) through A-1586(f)). |
October 2003: Water Rights Decisions in Washington’s Okanogan County Uphold Agency Decisions Reducing Diversions, Increasing Instream Flows County of Okanogan et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service); Methow Valley Irrigation District v. State of Washington, Department of Ecology, Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No 02-35512, Memorandum Opinion (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2003); Case No. 02-071, (Aug. 20, 2003). |
March 2003: Environmental Groups Challenge Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board's Decision to Issue a Waiver for Agricultural Return Flows Deltakeeper, et al. v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region Case No. 03CS00032 (Sacramento Superior Court). |
|
|
Animal Facilities |
|
|
|
Anti-Degradation Policies and Programs |
|
|
|
Aquatic Pesticides |
|
|
|
Arsenic |
|
|
|
Artificial Snow |
|
|
|
Bacteria |
|
|
|
Benzene |
|
|
|
Bills and Proposed Legislation |
|
|
|
California Clean Water State Revolving Fund |
|
|
|
Central Valley Region Basin Plan |
|
|
|
Certification Fees |
|
|
|
Chesapeake Bay |
|
|
|
Chromium 6 |
|
|
|
Civil Enforcement Actions |
|
|
|
Civil Liability |
|
|
|
Colorado River |
|
|
|
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations |
|
|
|
Conditional Waiver Fees |
|
|
|
Consultants |
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
|
Criminal Enforcement Actions |
|
|
|
Criminal Liability |
|
|
|
Cruise Ships |
|
|
|
Desalination |
|
|
|
Discharge Waivers |
|
|
|
Discharges |
|
|
|
Disinfection |
|
|
|
Dissolved Oxygen Levels |
|
|
|
Drinking Water |
July 2009: Bill Introduced to Remove Safe Drinking Water Act Exemption for Natural Gas Wells |
December 2008: U.S. EPA Poised to Leave Perchlorate Unregulated in Drinking Water |
December 2008: U.S. EPA Poised to Leave Perchlorate Unregulated in Drinking Water |
February 2008: Congress Asks Why Federal Agency Has Failed to Conduct TCE-Related Health Studies |
January 2008: EPA’s Long-Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule Upheld by D.C. Circuit City of Portland, Oregon v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ___F.3d__ _ 06-1068 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 6, 2007) |
December 2007: House Subcommittee Approves Bill to Require Perchlorate Standard |
November 2007: New State Regulations Set Legal Limit for Perchlorate in Public Water Supplies |
July 2007: Debate over the Effects of Perchlorate Jeopardizes the Future of Federal Legislation to Clean Up Drinking Water |
July 2007: Second Circuit Holds States’ Lawsuits against Oil Companies for MTBE Contamination of Drinking Water Supplies May Be Heard in State Court In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability Litigation, ___F.3d___ 04-5974-cv(L) and 04-6056-cv(CON) (2nd Cir. May 24, 2007) |
January 2006: District Court Finds Prisoners May Not Pursue Federal Class Action against U.S. Officials for Exposure to Contaminated Water—May Pursue Limited Claims against State Defendants Robert Suarez v. A1, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 06-2782 D.N.J. (D. NJ Dec. 13, 2006) |
December 2006: New Generation of Disinfection Byproducts Raise New Concerns |
November 2006: New Orleans Drinking Water Supply System Leaks Reduced by Half |
March 2006: Court of Appeal Upholds Lower Court Ruling that Plaintiff Failed to Prove a Discharge in Violation of Proposition 65 As You Sow v. Conbraco Industries, ___Cal.App. 4th___ A106660, (1st Dist. filed Dec. 12, 2005, certified for publication Jan. 4, 2006) |
January 2006: City of San Diego Sued Over Plans to Convert Wastewater Into Drinking Water Currie v. City of San Diego, Case No. GIC857292 filed Nov. 22, 2005 (San Diego Co. Super. Ct.) |
December 2005: Ninth Circuit Upholds Divestiture and Financial Penalties to Water System Operator for Violations of the Safe Drinking Water Actv United States v. Alisal Water Corp., ___F.3d___ 02-15907, 04-16210 (9th Cir. Oct. 13, 2005) |
May 2005: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Announces Drinking Water Lead Reduction Plan |
January 2005: Supreme Court of Virginia Bars Toxic Water Claims under Sovereign Immunity Doctrine City of Chesapeake v. Helen Cunningham 604 S.E.2d 420 (S.Ct. Va. Nov. 5, 2004) |
December 2004: Texas Appeals Court Affirms Conviction of Utility Operator for Providing Benzene-Tainted Water to Customers McCelvey v. State of Texas, ___S.W.3d___ 03-02-00649-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 26, 2004) |
June 2004: California Environmental Protection Agency Sets Public Health Goal for Arsenic in Drinking Water |
October 2002: Continuing Litigation and Administrative Processes Regarding Central Valley RWQCB’S Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Agricultural Return Flows Waterkeepers Northern California, et al. v. CVRWQCB, Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 02CS00289. Regional Water Quality Control Board |
October 2002: Settlements Reached with Remaining Defendants in California’s South Lake Tahoe MTBE Lawsuit South Tahoe Public Utility District v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Case No.999128 (San Fran.Super.Ct.Aug.5,2002). |
October 2002: California Court of Appeal Holds that State May Limit Concentration of Contaminant in Drinking Water Based on Detectable Taste to a Substantial Number, if Not Majority, of Consumers Western States Petroleum Association v. Department of Health Services ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. C037502 (3rd Dist., June 27, 2002). |
|
|
Effluent Limitations |
|
|
|
Endocrine Disruptors |
|
|
|
Enforcement |
|
|
|
EPA Lead Copper Rule |
|
|
|
Fees |
|
|
|
Fines and Penalties |
|
|
|
Fire |
|
|
|
Funding |
|
|
|
General |
|
|
|
Graywater |
|
|
|
Great Lakes Regional Collaboration Strategy to Restore and Protect the Great Lakes |
|
|
|
Green Infrastructure |
April 2008: aaa aaa aaa |
|
|
Groundwater |
May 2009: West Virginia Underground Injection of Coal Slurry a Growing Concern and the Subject of Proposed Legislation |
March 2009: Judicial Stay Lifted Allowing State Water Resources Control Board Perchlorate Hearings to Rekindle Goodrich Corporation, et al. v. California State Water Resources Control Board, et al. BS 115673 (Los Angeles Cnty Super Ct) |
February 2009: DWR Announces Local Groundwater Assistance Grant Awards; More Funds Available |
December 2008: District Court Allows Sewer Contamination Nuisance Action against City to Proceed, Rejecting Immunity Claims Adobe Lumber, Inc. v. Hellman, ___F.Supp.2d___ 05-1510 WBS PAN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008) |
December 2008: District Court Holds Statue of Limitations for CERCLA Response Costs Begins upon Completion of All Removal Actions—Groundwater Contamination Is a ‘Continuing’ Nuisance ENNS Pontiac, Buick, & GMC, et al. v. Flores, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 1:07-CV-1043 OWW DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2008) |
August 2008: U.S. EPA’s Final Rule Amending Federal Underground Injection Control Requirements Meets Administrative Procedure Act Requirements Miami-Dade County v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ___F.3d___ 06-10579, 06-10583, 06-10576, 06-10575, 06-10574, 06-10551 (11th Cir. June 6, 2008) |
June 2008: District Court Dismisses Claims Regarding Contamination of Amazonian River Basin in Peru Due to Forum Non Conveniens Carijiano et al. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ CV 07-5068 (C.D. Cal. April 15, 2008) |
April 2008: Water Users Attempt to Expand Sixth District’s 2007 Holding that Groundwater Augmentation Fees Are Subject to Proposition 218 Pajaro Sunny Mesa Community Services District v. Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency CV 159508, County of Santa Cruz Superior Court, filed Feb. 20, 2008 |
March 2008: New Mexico Cities and Towns Struggle to Achieve Compliance with EPA’s Arsenic Rule |
March 2008: Idaho Mining Association Busy Lobbying State Legislature on Water Issues |
November 2007: Third District Court Ruling in Bad Faith Insurance Case Likely to Impact Water Agency Negotiations in Groundwater Contamination Cases Aerojet-General Corporation v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 155 Cal.App.4th 132 (3rd Dist. 2007) |
August 2007: District Court Applies Porter-Cologne Act to Hold Defendants Liable for Government Response Costs under Polanco Act, but Government Not Excused from Notice Requirements Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, ___F.Supp.2d____ Civ. S-05-02087 (E.D. Cal. June 19, 2007) |
April 2007: Washington State Court of Appeals Upholds Preliminary Permit for Groundwater Testing Public Utility District No. 1 of Clark County v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, et al. ___P.3d___, (Wn.App. Feb. 6, 2007) |
November 2006: EPA Promulgates New Rule Regulating Contamination of Drinking Water Drawn from Groundwater (National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Ground Water Rule) 40 CFR Parts 9, 141 and 142 |
October 2006: Untimely Negligence Claim In Groundwater Litigation by Municipality against Hydrogeologist Is Allowed Based upon Discovery Rule Borough of Berlin v. Remington & Vernick Engineers L-2774-99 (N.J. App.Div. Aug. 23, 2006) |
March 2006: District Court Throws Out Property Damage and Medical Monitoring Claims Brought Following Contamination of Drinking Water Well Player v. Motiva Enterprises LLC, ___F.Supp.2d___ 02-3216 (D. N.J. Jan. 20, 2006) |
March 2006: District Court Holds State and Local Officials Are Entitled to Participate in the Selection of CERCLA Cleanups at Sites Formerly Owned by the United States City of Moses Lake v. United States, ___F.Supp.2d___ CV-04-0375-AAM, Doc. 181 (E.D. Wash. Dec. 30, 2005) |
February 2006: Georgia Environmental Protection Division Issues Draft Groundwater Management Plan to Combat Saltwater Intrusion |
September 2005: District Court Holds it Has No Jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Claims Attempting to Supplement EPA’s Chosen Remedial Alternatives North Pennsylvania Water Authority v. BAE Systems, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 04-4446 (E.D. Penn. July 19, 2005) |
July 2005: Whittaker Corporation Agrees to Pay over $500,000 to Treat Santa Clarita Well Contaminated with Perchlorate |
June 2005: Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Directs Nitrate Cleanup |
June 2005: Federal Circuit Court Affirms Dismissal of Inverse Condemnation Claim Arising from Pollution Adjacent to Military Base Moden v. United States, ___F.3d___ 04-5092 (D.C. Cir. April 15, 2005) |
May 2005: Perchlorate: An Emerging Contaminant of Environmental and Toxicological Concern |
March 2005: Orange County District Attorney Settles Suit against Shell Oil for Contamination Flowing from Underground Storage Tanks People of California v. Shell Oil Co. 80-40-31 (Orange County Superior Court, Jan. 5, 2005) |
December 2004: Erin Brokovich Revisited: PG&E Proposes New Solution for Cleaning Up Hinkley’s Groundwater. |
December 2004: Highest New York Court Finds Purchasers of Real Property Liable for Pre-Sale Contamination under the Oil Spill Act State of New York v. Speonk Fuel Inc. 117, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2438 (N.Y. App. Oct. 19, 2004) |
November 2004: Can Orange County’s Groundwater Replenishment System Provide a Model for the World? |
November 2004: Developer Unsuccessful in Suing Michigan for Potential Trespass of State Contamination Postma v. County of Ottawa and Waste Management of Michigan, Inc., Mich. Court of Appeals 243602, 2004 WL 1949317 (Mich. App. Sept. 2, 2004) |
September 2004: Minnesota District Court Finds Response Action by Private Party Not a “Removal” Pursuant to CERCLA. Jostens, Inc. v. Vopak, Inc., et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 02-3761 (D. Minn. July, 28, 2004) |
August 2004: Note: District Court Finds Date Overreaches in Natural Resource Damage Claims and Grants Summary Judgment State of New Mexico v. General Electric Company, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 991118 (BSJ/KVM), 991254 (BSJ/ACT) (D. N.M. June 19, 2004) |
July 2004: Court of Appeal Finds Lodi’s Municipal Environmental Ordinance Is Preempted by California Statute. City of Lodi v. Randtron 118 Cal. App. 4th 337 (2004). |
April 2004: Former Agents of Corporation Committing Environmental Violations Denied Permit Indiana Dep’t of Envtl. Mgmt. v. Boone County Res. Recovery Sys. Inc. 803 N.E.2d 267 (Ind. App. Feb. 16, 2004). |
April 2004: Los Osos Community Services District Files Suit for Adjudication of Rights to Los Osos Groundwater Basin |
April 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Approves Action to Implement Statewide Comprehensive Groundwater Quality Monitoring |
March 2004: Rialto Files First Lawsuit Regarding Cleanup of Perchlorate in San Bernardino County City of Rialto, et al. v. U.S. Dept. of Defense, et al Case No. CV 04-00079, filed Jan, 20, 2004 (C.D. Cal.). |
February 2004: U.S. District Court Finds City of Lodi’s Environmental Cleanup Ordinance Is Preempted by CERCLA and Partially Invalid Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v. City of Lodi, et al.; Unigard v. City of Lodi, et al. ___F.Supp.2d___, Civ. S98-1489 FCD/JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2003); ___F.Supp.2d___, Civ S98-1712 FCD/JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2003). |
December 2003: Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Issues Administrative Complaint against Sony Pictures for Violation of Water Code § 13376 |
November 2003: Sacramento County, Aerojet-General Corporation and the Boeing Company Execute Agreement to Address Water Supply Challenges Resulting from Groundwater Contamination |
September 2003: Eighth Circuit Rejects Insureds’ Attempt to Relitigate Insurance Coverage for Groundwater Contamination where It Uncovered New Evidenece of an “Accidental” Cause Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. FAG Bearings Corp. ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-3522 (8th Cir. July 10, 2003). |
July 2003: Second Circuit Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment that Language in Purchase Contract for Sale of Petroleum Business Constituted Sale of Assets Excluding Environmental Liabilities RJE Corp. v. Northville Indus. Corp ___F.3d___, Case No. 02-9116 (2nd Cir. May 15, 2003). |
July 2003: Study Finds High Levels of Perchlorate in Lettuce from California's Imperial Valley |
June 2003: Tenth Circuit Applies Doctrine of Continuing Nuisance to Groundwater Pollution Claim under Federal Tort Claims Act Hoery v. United States ___F.3d ___, Case No. 011100 (10th. Cir., April 11, 2003). |
June 2003: In a Case of First Impression, California Court of Appeal Holds One-Year Statute of Limitation Applies to Action to Recover Penalties under Proposition 65 Shamsian v. Atlantic Richfield Company ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. B157698 (2nd Dist. April 10, 2003). |
May 2003: State of California Settles Lawsuit with American States Water Company Regarding Contamination Emanating from Property Owned by Aerojet American States Water Company, et al. v. State of California, et al. Case No. 99AS05947 (Sacramento Superior Court). |
May 2003: Colorado Supreme Court Adopts Doctrine of Continuing Nuisance for Groundwater Contamination. Hoery v. United States 2003 Colo. LEXIS 116, Colorado Supreme Court, Case No. 02SA241, (Colo. Feb. 24, 2003). |
February 2003: Perchloroethylene and the Dry Cleaning Industry |
December 2002: San Bernardino County Adopts Groundwater Management Ordinance pertaining to County's Unincorporated, Unadjudicated Desert Region |
November 2002: District Court: Chemical Company Secures Trial on Coverage for DBCP Liability Dow Chemical Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 96-75832 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 28, 2002) |
November 2002: District Court Denies Attorney's Fees against Defendant Who Failed to Oppose Motion for Summary Judgment General Electric Company v. Berkshire Gas Company ___F.Supp. 2d___, Case No. 00-30164-MAP (D. Mass. Aug. 9, 2002) |
October 2002: Your Worst Nightmare: Providing Safe Drinking Water from a Superfund Site |
October 2002: Department of Health Services Prepares Draft Regulations Governing Recharge of Groundwater with Recycled Water |
October 2002: District Court Grants Class Certification Motion in Groundwater Contamination Case Mejdreck v. The Lockformer Co., ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No.01-C-6107 (N.D.Ill.Aug.9,2002). |
October 2002: Settlements Reached with Remaining Defendants in California’s South Lake Tahoe MTBE Lawsuit South Tahoe Public Utility District v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Case No.999128 (San Fran.Super.Ct.Aug.5,2002). |
October 2002: San Francisco Water Supply Bond to Proceed without Support of Environmental Groups |
September 2002: ARIZONA: Groundwater Management, Conjunctive Use and Water Banking |
June 2002: New Legislation Encourages Water Agency Involvement in Groundwater Investigations to Protect Drinking Water Supplies |
June 2002: Tanker Companies Must Reimburse State for Cost of Providing Alternate Water to Residents Due to Leaking USTs North Carolina v. Acme Petroleum ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-1665 (4th Cir. March 19, 2002). |
March 2002: California Supreme Court Decision and Water Agreement Affect San Gabriel Basin Cleanup Measures Hartwell Corporation et al. v. Superior Court of Ventura County ___Cal4th___, Case No. S082782 (Cal. Feb. 2, 2002) |
December 2001: Sixth Circuit Rules that Soil Remediation Expenses Should be Capitalized and Not Deducted United Dairy Farmers, Inc. v. United States, ___F.3d___, Case No. 003800 (6th Cir. Oct. 3, 2001). |
May 2001: Using Groundwater Models to Determine Liability and Foster Cleanup |
April 2001: California Court of Appeal Declines Automatic Disqualification of Attorney Whose Former Firm had Represented Adversary in Related Environmental Matters Daphne v. Aerojet-General Corporation ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. CO31323 (3rd. Dit. Feb. 7, 2001) |
|
|
Hazardous Waste |
|
|
|
Herbicides |
|
|
|
Indian Tribes |
|
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Interbasin Water Transfers |
|
|
|
Invasive Species |
|
|
|
Irrigated Lands Program |
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
|
|
Land Use |
|
|
|
Lead |
March 2006: Court of Appeal Upholds Lower Court Ruling that Plaintiff Failed to Prove a Discharge in Violation of Proposition 65 As You Sow v. Conbraco Industries, ___Cal.App. 4th___ A106660, (1st Dist. filed Dec. 12, 2005, certified for publication Jan. 4, 2006) |
May 2005: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Announces Drinking Water Lead Reduction Plan |
March 2004: Court of Appeal Finds California’s Lead and Copper Rule Test Methodology under SDWA Invalid Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation v. Edmund A. Gray Co., et al, __Cal.App.4th___, Case Nos. A100075, A100279 (1st Dist. Jan. 23, 2004; Corrected Jan. 27, 2004). |
July 2003: Appellate Parties Brief First District Court on Issue of Test Methodology in Drinking Water Contamination Cases Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation v. Edmund A. Gray, Co. et al. ___Cal.App.4th___, Case Nos. A100075, A1000279 (1st Dist. Sept. 17, 2002). |
November 2002: Tenth Circuit Holds that Federal RCRA Enforcement Is Permissible even after a State Initiates Its Own Enforcement Action United States v. Power Engineering Co ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-1217 (10th Cir. Sept. 4, 2002) |
|
|
Legal Education Conferences |
|
|
|
Market Based Water Quallity Credit Exchange |
|
|
|
Mercury |
|
|
|
Microbe Treatment |
|
|
|
Mining |
March 2009: News from the West |
March 2009: Montana Supreme Court Finds State Department of Environmental Quality Erroneously Issued a State Discharge Permit for Proposed Mining Operation Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana Departmentt of Environmental Quality 197 P.3d 482 (MT 2008) |
January 2009: News from the West |
August 2007: Colorado Water Court Rules Produced Water from Coalbed Methane Extraction Subject to Prior Appropriation Doctrine and State Administration Vance v. Simpson 05CW063, (Colorado District Court, Water Division 7, July 2, 2007) |
October 2006: West Virginia Relaxes Surface Mining Water Contamination Requirements |
September 2004: COLORADO: Enforcement of Water Quality Regulation and Penalties |
March 2004: District Court Rules that City of Healdsburg Is Required to Obtain NPDES Permit in Conjunction for Wastewater Discharges into Pond near the Russian River Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg ___F.Supp.2d.___, Case No. C 01-04686 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2004). |
June 2003: Tenth Circuit Denies Attorney Fees in Mooted Clean Water Act Case Amigos Bravos, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al. ___F.3d___, Case No. 02-2030 (10th Cir. April 2, 2003). |
|
|
MTBE |
July 2007: Second Circuit Holds States’ Lawsuits against Oil Companies for MTBE Contamination of Drinking Water Supplies May Be Heard in State Court In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability Litigation, ___F.3d___ 04-5974-cv(L) and 04-6056-cv(CON) (2nd Cir. May 24, 2007) |
February 2007: Third District Court Allows Strict Products Liability Cause of Action for MTBE Release D.J. Nelson v. Superior Court 144 Cal.App.4th 689 (3rd Dist. 2006) |
July 2003: Ninth Circuit Holds California's Ban on MTBE Not Preempted under the Clean Air Act Oxygenated Fuels Association Inc. v. Davis ___F.3d ___, Case No. 01-17078 (9th Cir. June 4, 2003). |
July 2003: H.R. 6 and S. 791: Federal Legislation Pending Regarding Insulation for Liability for MTBE Producers |
October 2002: Settlements Reached with Remaining Defendants in California’s South Lake Tahoe MTBE Lawsuit South Tahoe Public Utility District v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Case No.999128 (San Fran.Super.Ct.Aug.5,2002). |
October 2002: California Court of Appeal Holds that State May Limit Concentration of Contaminant in Drinking Water Based on Detectable Taste to a Substantial Number, if Not Majority, of Consumers Western States Petroleum Association v. Department of Health Services ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. C037502 (3rd Dist., June 27, 2002). |
September 2002: California Court of Appeal Holds that State May Limit Concentration of Contaminant in Drinking Water Based on Detectable Taste to a Substantial Number, if Not a Majority, of Consumers Western States Petroleum Association v. Department of Health Services, ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. C037502 (3rd Dist., June 27,2002). |
August 2002: MTBE: The Science behind the Contaminant of the Decade |
June 2002: MTBE Update: Are We Getting Somewhere? |
February 2001: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Order Approving Transfer of Water to CALFED's Environmental Water Account |
|
|
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits |
December 2002: Legislation Requires Orange County Sanitation District Ocean Discharges to Meet Secondary Treatment Standards within Ten Years |
December 2002: District Court: District Court in Indiana Reprimands State Agency's Sloppy Enforcement of CAFO Water Permitting Procedures Save the Valley, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. IP 99-0058-C-B/ G (S.D. Ind. Sept. 17, 2002). |
November 2002: Third Circuit Upholds EPA's Pretreatment Program Requirements for North Borough Publicly Owned Treatment Works Welch Foods, Inc. v. Borough of North East ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-3456 (3rd Cir. Sept. 13, 2002) |
November 2002: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Order on City of Vacaville's Petition for Review of Waste Discharge Requirements. |
October 2002: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Flood Irrigation Practice under Clean Water Act Agricultural Exemption Fishermen against the Destruction of the Environment, Inc. v. Closter Farms, Inc., ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-11932 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2002). |
July 2002: Federal Actions: Ninth Curcuit Denies Citizen Suit Contesting Renewal of NPDES Permit ONRC Action v. Columbia Plywood Inc. 286 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2002). |
July 2002: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposes Water Quality Trading Program |
July 2002: TMDL Regulations Apply to All National Waters: Even if Only Affected by Nonpoint Source Pollution Pronsolino, et al. v. Nastri, et al ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-16026, No. 0016027 (9th Cir. May 31, 2002). |
June 2002: Ninth Circuit Denies Citizen Suit Contesting Renewal of NPDES Permit ONRC Action v. Columbia Plywood Inc. 286 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2002). |
March 2002: COLORADO: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: TEXAS: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: CALIFORNIA: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: OREGON: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: WASHINGTON: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: UTAH: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: ARIZONA: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: IDAHO: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: NEW MEXICO: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
January 2002: Status of the Environmental Protection Agenciy's Development of New TMDL Rule |
December 2001: Court of Appeals: Transport of Water through State Distribution System May Require NPDES Permit under the Clean Water Act Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., et al. v. City of New York, et al., ___F.3d___, Docket No. 00-9447 (2nd Cir. Oct. 23, 2001). |
November 2001: Tenth Circuit Finds States Are Not Required to Adopt Regulatory Systems for Nonpoint Source Pollution at the Antidegradation Stage under the Clean Water Act American Wildlands, et al. v. Browner, et al. 260 F.3d 1192 (10th Cir. 2001). |
November 2001: FEDERAL/ARIZONA: Ninth Circuit Finds "Shall" Means "May" - EPA Decisions Regarding Enforcement Action under the Clean Water Act Are Discretionary Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. Sierra Club, et al. v. Whitman, et al. ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-16895 (9th Cir. Oct. 2, 2001). |
July 2001: State Water Resources Control Board Adopts Modifications to General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity |
July 2001: State Water Resources Control Board Adopts Modifications to General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity |
|
|
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems |
|
|
|
Nitrates |
|
|
|
Nonpoint Source Pollution |
June 2009: Pennsylvania DEP’s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Rejected by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Borough of Bedford v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 160 M.D. 2008 (Penn. Com.Ct. April 14, 2009) |
August 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Passes Resolution 2004-0035 to Implement the Consolidated Watershed Protection, Watershed Management, Drinking Water Quality, and Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grants. |
March 2004: California Regional Water Quality Control Boards Adopt New Waivers for Nonpoint Source Discharges |
February 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Proposed Policy for Implementation and Enforcement of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program |
August 2002: "Nonpoint Source" Pollution Regulation in International Streams: The United States-Mexico Border |
July 2002: TMDL Regulations Apply to All National Waters: Even if Only Affected by Nonpoint Source Pollution Pronsolino, et al. v. Nastri, et al ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-16026, No. 0016027 (9th Cir. May 31, 2002). |
November 2001: Tenth Circuit Finds States Are Not Required to Adopt Regulatory Systems for Nonpoint Source Pollution at the Antidegradation Stage under the Clean Water Act American Wildlands, et al. v. Browner, et al. 260 F.3d 1192 (10th Cir. 2001). |
October 2001: Tenth Circuit Upholds Montana's Water Quality Laws American Wildlands v. Browner ___ F.3d ___, Case No. 00-1224 (10th Cir. Aug. 8, 2001). |
|
|
Nutrient Criteria |
|
|
|
Ocean Acidification |
|
|
|
Oceans and Seas |
|
|
|
Owens River |
|
|
|
PCE |
|
|
|
Perchlorate |
March 2009: Judicial Stay Lifted Allowing State Water Resources Control Board Perchlorate Hearings to Rekindle Goodrich Corporation, et al. v. California State Water Resources Control Board, et al. BS 115673 (Los Angeles Cnty Super Ct) |
November 2007: New State Regulations Set Legal Limit for Perchlorate in Public Water Supplies |
March 2006: Court Rules that Revised EIR Adequately Disclosed Water Supply Uncertainty and Perchlorate Impact in SCOPE Case Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment v. County of Los Angeles (Newhall Land and Farming Co.) 1043805 (Santa Barbara Co. Super. Ct. Jan. 6, 2006) |
December 2005: Second District Decertifies Environmental Impact Report Based upon Inadequate Water Supply Analysis California Oak Foundation v. City of Santa Clarita,___Cal.App.4th___ B175580 (2nd Dist. Nov. 2, 2005) |
April 2005: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Establishes Official Reference Dose for Perchlorate |
April 2004: Perchlorate Remediation Continues Statewide as Purveyors Await “Public Health Goal” |
March 2004: Rialto Files First Lawsuit Regarding Cleanup of Perchlorate in San Bernardino County City of Rialto, et al. v. U.S. Dept. of Defense, et al Case No. CV 04-00079, filed Jan, 20, 2004 (C.D. Cal.). |
January 2004: California Legislature Passes Two Bills Addressing Perchlorate Contamination |
August 2003: Perchlorate: A Contaminant of the Decade |
July 2003: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Investigates Use of Perchlorate at Former General Dynamics Facility in Rialto |
July 2003: Study Finds High Levels of Perchlorate in Lettuce from California's Imperial Valley |
|
|
Pesticides |
|
|
|
Petroleum Hydrocarbons |
July 2007: Kinder Morgan, SFPP Agree to Pay Nearly $5.3 Million to Resolve Federal and State Environmental Violations for Suisun, Alameda, and Donner Lake Spills |
December 2004: San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Issues a Site Cleanup Order for the Former Oakland Army Base |
July 2003: Second Circuit Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment that Language in Purchase Contract for Sale of Petroleum Business Constituted Sale of Assets Excluding Environmental Liabilities RJE Corp. v. Northville Indus. Corp ___F.3d___, Case No. 02-9116 (2nd Cir. May 15, 2003). |
July 2003: Fourth Circuit Limits Contractual Obligation of Gas Station Seller that Contracted to Remove USTs Harris, Inc. v. Kenyon Oil Co., Inc. ___F.3d___, Case No. 02-1957 (4th Cir. April 30, 2003) |
February 2003: Neither "Passive Migration" nor "Continued Presence" of Toxic Contaminants Constitutes a "Discharge" or "Release" under Proposition 65 Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. B153817 (2nd Dist. Dec. 17, 2002). |
|
|
Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
|
Phosphorus |
|
|
|
Point Source Pollution |
|
|
|
Pollution |
August/September 2003: California Court of Appeal Decides Question of Narrative Standards under Clean Water Act Communities for a Better Environment v. State Water Resources Control Bd. ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. A1000327 (1st Dist. May 30, 2003). |
August 2003: New Research Indicates that Microbes Will Be Effective in Treating Vinyl Chloride Contamination |
June 2003: State Water Resources Control Board Holds Public Hearing and Workshop on Proposed Revised Workplan to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries |
June 2003: Ninth Circuit Holds Discharge of Unaltered Groundwater Is "Pollution" within the Meaning of the Clean Water Act Northern Plains Resource Council v. Fidelity Exploration and Development Company, ___F.3d___, Case No. 0235836 (9th Cir. April 10, 2003). |
June 2003: Washington State Enforcement Action Deeming Water Diversion Pollution" Alarms Water Users, Energizes Legislature |
January 2003: State Decisions: California Court of Appeal Precludes Use of "Minimum Level" Standards Application to NPDES Permit Compliance under the Clean Water Act WaterKeepers Northern California, et al. v. California State Water Resources Contro Board ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. AO94917 (1st Dist. Oct. 24, 2002). |
June 2002: Defendants Escape with Sanctions Sought because of Their Alleged Failure to Comply with Discovery Orders Kara Holding Corp. v. Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc. ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 99 Civ. 0275 (RWS), (S.D. N.Y. March 29, 2002). |
February 2001: Sixth Circuit Holds District Court Must Sentence Wetlands Developer in Accordance with United States Sentencing Guidelines United States v. Rapanos ___F.3d___,No.98-2424 (6th Cir. Dec. 15, 2000) |
|
|
Pollution & Contamination |
|
|
|
Porter-Cologne |
April 2001: California: Cities Sue Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Over Trash Total Maximum Daily Loads for Los Angeles River Watershed Cities of Arcadia,Artesia,et al.v.California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Los Angeles Region Case Nos.A-1280,A-1280(a),and A-280(b) (Los Angeles County Superior Court). |
April 2001: Cities Sue Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board over Trash Total Maximum Daily Loads for Los Angeles River Watershed Cities of Arcadia,Artesia,et al.v.California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Los Angeles Region Case Nos.A-1280,A-1280(a),and A-280(b)(Los Angeles County Superior Court). |
|
|
Poultry Farms |
|
|
|
Recyled Water |
|
|
|
Rotenone |
|
|
|
Runoff |
March 2009: Oregon Statewide Water Roundtables Results—A Snapshot of Water Issue Perspectives across the State |
December 2008: First Circuit Permits Developer to Proceed in Federal Civil Rights Action against City for Alleged Obstruction of Development Project SBT Holdings v. Town of Westminster, ___F.3d___ 08-1512 (1st Cir. Nov. 6, 2008) |
April 2007: Massachusetts Appellate Court Reverses Trial Court’s Finding of No Trespass and Nuisance Based upon Storm Water Overflow Trenz v. Town of Norwell 06-P-254 (Mass. App. Feb. 20, 2007) |
January 2005: Fourth District Upholds San Diego RWQCB Permit Aimed at Reducing Runoff from Municipal Storm Sewers Building Industry Association of San Diego County v. State Water Resources Control Board, ___Cal.App.4th___ D042385 (4th Dist. Dec. 7, 2004) |
May 2003: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Rescinds Dairy Runoff Waiver |
March 2003: North Carolina Court Finds Environmental Groups Have No Standing to Bring Common Law Claims over Alleged Contamination to State Waters Neuse River Foundation, Inc. et al. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc., et al Case No. COA01-1205, (N.C. App. Dec. 31, 2002) |
January 2003: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Adopts Conditional Two-Year Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Agricultural Return Flows |
December 2002: District Court: District Court in Indiana Reprimands State Agency's Sloppy Enforcement of CAFO Water Permitting Procedures Save the Valley, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. IP 99-0058-C-B/ G (S.D. Ind. Sept. 17, 2002). |
January 2002: NEW MEXICO: Environmental Groups Intend to Refile Suit Contending New Mexico's Water Quality Standards Illegally Exempt Agricultural Runoffs and Fail to Protect Endangered Species Defenders of Wildlife and Forest Guardians v. United States Environmental Protection Agency CIV No. 011252 DJS/ WWD (D. N.M. filed Nov. 2, 2001) |
|
|
Safe Drinking Water Act |
February 2003: California Appellate Court Affirms Trial Court's Ruling that "Passive Migration" Is Not a "Discharge or Release" within the Meaning of the State's Proposition 65 Statute Consumer Advocacy Group Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. B153817 (2nd Dist. Dec. 17, 2002). |
June 2001: California Court Throws Out Several "Proposition 65" Lawsuits Using Federal Precedent on the Adequacy of 60-Day Notices Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Arco Oil & Gas Company, et al. ___Cal.App.4th___, Case Nos.B132719,B1322723,B134924 (2nd Dist. April 25, 2001) |
January 2001: Individuals Held Liable for Civil Penalties under the Safe Drinking Water Act United States v. Alisal Water Corp., ___F.Supp.2d___,2000 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 13454 (N.D.Cal, Sept. 15, 2000) |
|
|
Salinity |
|
|
|
Salton Sea |
|
|
|
Seawater Intrusion |
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
Sentencing |
|
|
|
Ship Ballast |
|
|
|
Stormwater |
November 2008: Ninth Circuit Applies Penn Central ‘Takings’ Standard to ‘Generally Applicable Development’ Conditions Tapps Brewing v. City of Sumner, ___F.3d___ 07-35231 (9th Cir. Sept. 25, 2008) |
November 2007: Connecticut High Court Finds Town’s Grant of Private Easement for Stormwater Drainage over Public Lands Must Allow for Public Comment and Participation Wayne C. Gerlt v. Town of South Windsor 284 Conn. 178 (Conn. Oct. 9, 2007) |
May 2007: New York High Court Rules New York City’s DEP Abused Its Discretion in Exercising Jurisdiction over Proposed Subsurface Sewage Treatment System Nilsson v. Department of Environmental Protection of City of New York 2007 N.Y.Slip Op. 02790 (N.Y. April 3, 2007) |
April 2007: Massachusetts Appellate Court Reverses Trial Court’s Finding of No Trespass and Nuisance Based upon Storm Water Overflow Trenz v. Town of Norwell 06-P-254 (Mass. App. Feb. 20, 2007) |
March 2007: Fourth-Term San Diego County MS4 Permit Adopted by RWQCB |
May 2006: Builders Association Fails in Its Challenge to New Jersey DEP Stormwater Management 300 Foot ‘No Build’ Buffer In the Matter of Stormwater Management Rules (N.J. App. April 12, 2006) |
June 2004: Washington Supreme Court Decides Against Requiring a Water Right for Stromwater Management Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, et al., ___P.3d___ 73419-4 (Wash. Sup. Ct. May 14, 2004). |
November 2003: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Water Quality Order on General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Projects |
March 2003: The Wandering Clean Water Act: Ninth Circuit Tackles Regulation of Stormwater Pollution from "Small" Dischargers Environmental Defense Center, Inc., et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ___F.3d___, Consolidated Case Nos. 00-70014; 00-70734; 0070822 (9th Cir. Feb 14, 2003). |
March 2003: Environmental Groups Challenge Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board's Decision to Issue a Waiver for Agricultural Return Flows Deltakeeper, et al. v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region Case No. 03CS00032 (Sacramento Superior Court). |
August 2002: City's Storm Drainage Fee Is a Property-related Fee under Prop 218. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn., et. al. v. City of Salinas, et. al., 98 Cal.App.4th 1351 (6th Dist.). |
August 2002: Storm Drainage Fee Imposed on "Each and Every Parcel of Developed Land" Is a Property-related Fee Requiring Voter Approval under Prop 218 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. City of Salinas, 98 Cal.App.4th 1351 (6th Dist. 2002). |
January 2002: State Water Resources Control Board Upholds Strict Regulations on Storm-Water Runoff |
November 2001: ARIZONA: EPA Increasingly Active on Storm Water Compliance; Endangered Species Act Connection |
July 2001: Organizations Appeal San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board's Adoption of Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Urban Runoff |
|
|
Stream and River Flows |
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
TCP 1,2,3 trichloropropane |
|
|
|
Terrorism |
|
|
|
Testing Methodology |
|
|
|
Timber Harvesting |
June 2007: First District Rules EIR Required for Timberland-to- Vineyard Conversion with Potential Impacts to Watershed and ‘Sediment and Temperature Impaired’ Salmon Sierra Club v. California Department of Forestry, ___Cal.App.4th___ A113774 (1st Dist. Mar. 29, 2007) |
August 2005: State Water Resources Control Board Orders Enrollment of Timber Harvest Plans under General Water Discharge Requirements Order Vacated In the Matter of the Petition of Humboldt Watershed Council, et al. SWRCB Order WQ 2005-0009, June 16, 2005 |
August 2004: California Supreme Court Grants Review of Case Upholding Water Board Authority to Regulate Effects of Timber Harvesting Pacific Lumber Co. v. California State Water Resources Control Board, 116 Cal.App.4th 1232 (2004),Rev. Granted, Cal Supreme Ct. S124464 (June 16, 2004) |
May 2004: California Department of Forestry Approval of Timber Harvest Plan Did Not Preclude the SWRCB from Separately Requiring Water Quality Protection Measures Pacific Lumber Company v. California State Water Resources Control Board ___Cal.App.4th___, Case No. A102399 (1st Dist. March 18, 2004). |
March 2004: California Regional Water Quality Control Boards Adopt New Waivers for Nonpoint Source Discharges |
December 2003: Governor Davis Approves Bill Granting Regional Water Quality Control Boards Veto Power over Approval of Timber Harvesting Plans. |
December 2003: Governor Davis Approves Bill Granting Regional Water Quality Control Boards Veto Power over Approval of Timber Harvesting Plans |
January 2002: State Water Resources Control Board Requires Water Quality Monitoring of Logging in the "Hole in the Headwaters"; Is It Expanding Its Jurisdiction over Lands with Timber Harvesting Plans? |
|
|
Total Maximum Daily Loads |
April 2003: Los Angeles County Sanitation District and City of Santa Clarita Ban Future Installation of Residential Water Softeners |
February 2003: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposes Withdrawal of the Final July 2002 TMDL Rule |
November 2002: State Water Resources Control Board Adopts New Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for Los Angeles Coastal Beaches |
September 2002: Eleventh Circuit Finds that District Court Improperly Modified Consent Decree in Clean Water Act TMDL Case Sierra Club v. Meiburg ___F.3d___,Case No.01-14587 (11th Cir.July 2,2002). |
August 2002: Los Angeles RWQCB Proposes Draft Santa Monica Bay Beaches "Wet" Weather Bacteria TMDL |
July 2002: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposes Water Quality Trading Program |
July 2002: TMDL Regulations Apply to All National Waters: Even if Only Affected by Nonpoint Source Pollution Pronsolino, et al. v. Nastri, et al ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-16026, No. 0016027 (9th Cir. May 31, 2002). |
June 2002: Ninth Circuit Finds that EPA Had No Duty to Establish Total Maximum Daily Loads for the State of California San Francisco Baykeeper v. Whitman, ___F.3d___ Case No. 01-16111 (April 15, 2002, amended May 3, 2002). |
March 2002: COLORADO: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: Los Angeles Regional Board Adopts "Dry Weather" TMDL for Santa Monica Bay Beaches |
March 2002: TEXAS: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: CALIFORNIA: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: OREGON: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: WASHINGTON: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: UTAH: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: ARIZONA: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: IDAHO: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
March 2002: NEW MEXICO: Clean Water Act Issues Impacting Water Supply |
January 2002: Clean Water Act Update: An Old Dog With New Tricks by Paeter E. Garcia, Esq. with the Los Angeles law firm of Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava & MacCuish, LLP |
January 2002: Status of the Environmental Protection Agenciy's Development of New TMDL Rule |
June 2001: NRDC Recoups Large Fee Award in Clean Water Act Case Despite Losing on Most of its Claims Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Fox 129 F.Supp.2d 666 (S. D. N. Y Feb. 6, 2001) |
April 2001: Texas: Dairy Industry, City of Waco Fight with State Water Agency over Tightened Regulations Designed To Control Nutrient Loading of North Bosque River |
January 2001: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Solicits Comments on Costs of Total Maximum Daily Loads Program |
January 2001: Federal: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Solicits Comments on Costs of Total Maximum Daily Loads Program |
|
|
Vessel Ballast Water |
|
|
|
Volatile Organic Compounds |
|
|
|
Waste Dischages |
March 2005: CALIFORNIA: Interstate and International Water Issues |
December 2003: Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Issues Administrative Complaint against Sony Pictures for Violation of Water Code § 13376 |
December 2003: State Water Resources Control Board Issues Draft Water Quality Order on Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Dredged or Fill Discharges |
August 2003: Texas Legislature Considers Limiting Public Participation in Water Quality Permit Proceedings |
June 2003: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Reconsiders Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Irrigated Lands |
January 2003: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Adopts Conditional Two-Year Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Agricultural Return Flows |
November 2002: State Water Resources Control Board Adopts New Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for Los Angeles Coastal Beaches |
November 2002: Governor Approves AB 3000, Increasing Fees for Waste Dischargers and Adding Water Quality Criterion to Fee Calculation. |
October 2002: Continuing Litigation and Administrative Processes Regarding Central Valley RWQCB’S Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Agricultural Return Flows Waterkeepers Northern California, et al. v. CVRWQCB, Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 02CS00289. Regional Water Quality Control Board |
August 2002: Tenth Circuit Reverses Jury Verdict Awarding Insurance Coverage to Colorado Sewage Treatment Entity, though Notice Was Untimely Metro Wastewater Reclamation District v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, ___F.3d___, Nos. 99-1327, 99-1336, 01-1196, 01-1234 (10th Cir. May 24, 2002). |
June 2002: State Water Resources Control Board Commences Statewide Review of Waivers for Agricultural Discharges |
|
|
Wastewater |
March 2009: A Publicly Owned Treatment Work’s Ownership of Recycled Water: A New Frontier in Water Rights |
February 2008: Sacramento Superior Court Invalidates EIR for Expansion of Sacramento Area Wastewater Treatment Plant Contra Costa Water District v. Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, 05CS00908 (Sac. Co. Super. Ct. Nov. 28, 2007) |
January 2008: Twenty Years Later, N.Y. High Court Approves Application for Land Development and Sewage Treatment Plant despite Drinking Water Implications In the matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board of Town of South East 2007 N.Y. slip. op. 09064 (N.Y. Nov. 19, 2007) |
June 2007: Eleventh Circuit holds Florida’s Strict Liability Statute Did Not Preclude Personal Injury Suit for Contamination Damages Annette Florence v. Crescent Resources, LLC, ___F.3d___ 06-13587 (11th Cir. April 18, 2007) |
June 2007: New York Trial Court Finds Residential Discharge of Wastewater May Lead to Wetlands Violation Liability Pland Place Realty Corp. v. Hauber 11917/02 (Richmond County Supreme Ct. April 24, 2007) |
March 2007: Tribe Liability for Effluent Limitations at Casino Wastewater Control Facility Reduced Due to Regional Board Errors in Effluent Calculations |
February 2007: Wastewater Collection Systems in Los Angeles County to Fund Environmentally Beneficial Projects in Satisfaction of Liability for Unauthorized Overflows |
January 2006: Canadian Group Decries Sewage Pollution in Great Lakes |
January 2006: Mississippi Gulf Coast Water and Wastewater Resources Plan Has a Half- Billion-Dollar Price Tag |
June 2006: Superior Court Judge Strikes Down Los Osos Initiative Related to Siting of Sewer and Wastewater Treatment Facilities Taxpayers Watch v. Los Osos Community Services District CV 05-1012 (San Luis Obispo Co. Superior Ct. April 3, 2006) |
June 2006: Water Environment Federation Publishes Assessment of Wastewater Utilities Affected by Katrina Reconstruction Costs and Debt Management |
June 2006: Northeast Florida Increases Residential Irrigation with Treated Sewage Ef-fluent |
March 2006: ‘Principal County’ LAFCO Had Exclusive Jurisdiction to Establish Sphere of Influence for a Multi-County District within the Boundaries of the Local LAFCO’s County Placer County Local Agency Formation Commission v. Nevada County Local Agency Formation Commission 135 Cal.App.4th 793 (3rd Dist. 2006) |
January 2006: City of San Diego Sued Over Plans to Convert Wastewater Into Drinking Water Currie v. City of San Diego, Case No. GIC857292 filed Nov. 22, 2005 (San Diego Co. Super. Ct.) |
July 2005: North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board Files Administrative Civil Liability Complaint against Georgia-Pacific Corporation Fort Bragg Lumber Mill |
July 2005: South Bay Centralized Waste Treatment Plant Violated Clean Water Act by Mingling Waste Streams and Failing to Properly Monitor Discharges to POTW In re Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc., Docket No. CWA-307-9-05-46 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9) |
June 2005: Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Directs Nitrate Cleanup |
December 2004: First District Affirms Mandatory Minimum Penalty of $243,000 for Violations of Wastewater Discharge Permit by the City of Brentwood City of Brentwood v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, ___Cal.App.4th___ A102819 (1st Dist. Oct. 27, 2004) |
November 2004: State Water Resources Control Board Adopts Water Rights and Water Quality Fee Schedules for 2004-2005 |
August 2004: Angel Island State Park Replaces Discharge of Secondary Treated Effluent to Central San Francisco Bay with Land Disposal to Onsite Subsurface Land Disposal System |
July 2004: Sixth Circuit Dismisses Clean Water Act Citizen Suit Based on City’s Improvement to Wastewater Treatment Systems. Ailor v. City of Maynardville, ___F.3d___ 01-6562 (6th Cir. May 17, 2004). |
January 2004: First Circuit Upholds District Court’s Refusal to Take Jurisdiction over Clean Water Act Claim for User Charges Templeton Board of Sewer Commissioners v. American Tissue Mills of Massachusetts, Inc. ___F.3d___, Case No. 03-1134 (1st Cir. Dec 9, 2003). |
January 2004: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Issues Draft Policy on Municipal Wastewater Treatment Requirements during Wet Weather Conditions 68 Fed.Reg. 63042 (Nov. 7, 2003). |
October 2003: Utah State Engineer to Address the Right to Make Reuse of Treated Waste Water |
August 2003: Texas Legislature Considers Limiting Public Participation in Water Quality Permit Proceedings |
June 2003: Fourth Circuit Approves Nationwide Permit Program for Construction of Wastewater Treatment Plant Crutchfield v. County of Hanover 325 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2003). |
March 2003: WASHINGTON: Meeting Water Needs in the Face of Diminished Supply - The Role of Water Conservation and Reuse |
November 2002: Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Conflicts Between Water Reuse and the Law of Water Rights |
November 2002: Third Circuit Upholds EPA's Pretreatment Program Requirements for North Borough Publicly Owned Treatment Works Welch Foods, Inc. v. Borough of North East ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-3456 (3rd Cir. Sept. 13, 2002) |
August 2002: Tenth Circuit Reverses Jury Verdict Awarding Insurance Coverage to Colorado Sewage Treatment Entity, though Notice Was Untimely Metro Wastewater Reclamation District v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, ___F.3d___, Nos. 99-1327, 99-1336, 01-1196, 01-1234 (10th Cir. May 24, 2002). |
June 2002: Colorado District Court Finds No Reason to Stay Clean Water Act Citizen Suit, Despite Existence of Pending State Agency Proceeding on Discharge Sierra Club, et al. v. El Paso Gold Mines, Inc. ___F.Supp.2d___, Civil Action No. 01-PC-2163 (D. Colo. April 12, 2002). |
January 2002: Louisiana Court of Appeals Holds Owner of Premises Not Liable for Lessee's Contracts to Remediate Spills Coastal Environmental Specialists, Inc. v. Chem-Lig International Industries, Inc. & David Stutz 2001 La. App. LEXIS 2631 (Nov. 9, 2001). |
December 2001: Ninth Circuit Finds "Shall" Means "May" - EPA Decisions Regarding Enforcement Action under the Clean Water Act Are Discretionary Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review Sierra Club, et al. v. Whitman, et al. ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-16895 (9th Cir. Oct. 2, 2001). |
November 2001: FEDERAL/ARIZONA: Ninth Circuit Finds "Shall" Means "May" - EPA Decisions Regarding Enforcement Action under the Clean Water Act Are Discretionary Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. Sierra Club, et al. v. Whitman, et al. ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-16895 (9th Cir. Oct. 2, 2001). |
November 2001: TEXAS: State Appellate Court Upholds Criminal Fine against Homeowner for Unlawful Discharge of Sewage Landry v. State (Tex. App. Houston, 14th Dist. Sept. 6, 2001). |
|
|
Water Quality |
|
|
|
Water Quality Monitoring Reports |
|
|
|
Water Quality Trading |
|
|
|
Water Softeners |
|
|
|
Water Supply |
|
|
|
Watercraft Restrictions |
|
|
|
Watersheds |
|
|
|
Wetlands |
January 2009: Virginia Court of Appeals finds Standing For Chesapeake Bay Foundation to Challenge Wetlands Permit Extension for King William Reservoir Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Commonwealth of Virginia 2545-07-02 (VA.App. Nov. 4, 2008) |
March 2006: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Begins Work to Restore Section of the Lower Owens River |
August 2002: Supreme Court: United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Consider whether Plowing Ranchland to Prepare It for Crops Requires a Section 404 Permit under the Federal Clean Water Act Borden Ranch Partnership, et al. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al., Cert Granted, 122 S.Ct. 2355(2002). |
August 2002: In Arizona, Federal Judge Halts North Phoenix Development Based on Effects of Clean Water Act Permit Save Our Sonoran v. Flowers, et al., ___F.Supp..2d___, Case no. CIV-02-0761-PHX-SRB (D. Az.) |
July 2002: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers Adopt Final Rules on "Fill" and "Discharge of Fill" |
July 2002: A Peat Mining Company Petitions to the United States Supreme Court to Address EPA's Authority in a State-Administered Wetland Permit Program Under the Clean Water Act Michigan Peat v. United States, (6th Cir. 2001) petition for cert. filed Case No. 011384 (U.S. Mar. 18, 2002). |
February 2001: Sixth Circuit Holds District Court Must Sentence Wetlands Developer in Accordance with United States Sentencing Guidelines United States v. Rapanos ___F.3d___,No.98-2424 (6th Cir. Dec. 15, 2000) |
|
|
Wrongful Termination |
|
|
|
|