















|
Your path: Home) Archive Page) Subjects) Statutes - Federal) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
|
|
Abstention Doctrine |
|
|
|
Adjacent Property |
|
|
|
Administration |
|
|
|
Administrative Orders |
|
|
|
Asbestos |
|
|
|
Attorneys Fees |
November 2007: District Court Rejects Use of Consent Order to Establish Plaintiff as ‘Prevailing Party’ in Parallel RCRA Suit Initiated by Private Party Menard, Inc. v. Wells Manufacturing Company, ___F.Supp.2d___ 03 C 8313 (N.D. Ill Sept. 11, 2007) |
December 2005: Third Circuit Allows Award of Attorneys’ Fees in RCRA Citizen-Suit Case Based upon Market Rates where Counsel Is Located, Not in Venue where Case Is Litigated Interfaith Community Organization v. Heller-Jersey City, L.L.C., ___F.3d ___ 04-3702 (3rd Cir. Oct. 19, 2005) |
December 2005: Tenth Circuit Provides Guidance on How to Determine a ‘Prevailing Party’ in Fee-Shifting Cases Browder v. City of Moab, ___F3d___ 04-4198 and 04-4206 (10th Cir. Oct. 14, 2005) |
June 2003: Ninth Circuit Upholds Denial of Attorney's Fees Award in RCRA Case, Finding that Catalyst Theory of Recovery Inufficient in Face of Supreme Court Decision Kasza v. Whitman/Frost v. Rumsfeld ___F.3d___, Case Nos. 00-16378, 00-16379 (9th Cir. April 14, 2003). |
May 2003: When Is an Attorney's Fee Award "Appropriate"? The Double Standard in Awarding Attorney's Fees in Environmental Citizen Suits |
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
|
|
Causation |
|
|
|
Chlorinated Aliphatics Rule |
|
|
|
Chlorinated Solvents |
|
|
|
Citizen Suits |
June 2010: District Court Determines State Order Regarding PCE/TCE Cleanup Does Not Bar Citizen Suit under RCRA Regarding Same Contamination Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Dickson, Tennessee, ___F.Supp.2d___ No.3:08-0229 (M.D. Tenn. April 1, 2010) |
April 2009: District Court Decides Private Citizen Suits Are Not Barred by Previous Administrative Actions Hernandez v. Esso Standard Oil Co., ___F.Supp.2d___ 03-1485 (D. Puerto Rico, Feb. 10, 2009) |
February 2009: District Court Dismisses Citizen Suit under RCRA against Environmental Consultant Due to Lack of Privity of Contract Ridge Seneca Plaza, LLC v. BP Products North America, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 06-CV-6333 (W.D. N.Y. Dec. 16, 2008) |
January 2008: District Court Holds RCRA Citizen Suit Provision’s Waiver of Sovereign Immunity May Not Apply to Suit against U.S. Otherwise Barred by Flood Control Act In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation, ___F.Supp.2d___ 05-4182 (E.D. La. Nov. 2, 2007) |
December 2007: District Court Lacks Jurisdiction over RCRA Citizen-Suit Requesting Remediation Beyond that Required by EPA under CERCLA Public Service Company of Colorado v. Schrader Oil Company, ___F.Supp.2d___ 05-CV-0785 (D. Colo. Oct. 10, 2007) |
August 2007: District Court Rejects Abstention in Determining Citizen Claims under RCRA where State Underground Storage Tank Law Offered Alternative Relief K-7 Enterprises v. Jester, et. al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 4:06-CV-57 (E.D. Tx. June 20, 2007) |
February 2007: District Court Holds Cleanup and Abatement Order Not Subject to Clean Water Act Citizen Suit Humboldt Baykeeper v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., ___F.Supp.2___ C 06-02560 JSW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2006) |
February 2007: First Circuit Finds Reasonable Prospect of Future Harm Raises Citizen Suit Standing under RCRA Maine People’s Alliance and Natural Resources Defense Council v. Mallinckrodt, ___F.3d___ 05-2331 (1st Cir. Dec. 22, 2006) |
November 2005: District Court in Maryland Requires Evidence of Continuous Violations for Liability under the CWA but Not under RCRA Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc. v. National Capital Skeet and Trap Club, Inc., ___ F.Supp.2d___ WDQ-05-549 (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2005) |
April 2005: Third Circuit Affirms Massive Excavation and Cleanup Order of Hackensack River Site under RCRA Interfaith Community Organization, et al. v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc., et al., ___F.3d___ 03-2760, 03-3037, 03-3585 (3rd Cir. Feb. 18, 2005) |
January 2004: District Court in Louisiana Holds that RCRA Citizen Suit May Be Used to Enjoin Future Conduct Holy Cross v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 03-370 Section “L”(4) (E.D. La. Nov. 3, 2003). |
June 2003: Ninth Circuit Upholds Denial of Attorney's Fees Award in RCRA Case, Finding that Catalyst Theory of Recovery Inufficient in Face of Supreme Court Decision Kasza v. Whitman/Frost v. Rumsfeld ___F.3d___, Case Nos. 00-16378, 00-16379 (9th Cir. April 14, 2003). |
June 2002: District Court: New Jersey District Court Grants Standing to Community Organization in RCRA Suit against Owner of Former Chromate Chemical Production Facility. Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc. ___F.Supp.2d___, No. 95-2097-DMC (D. N.J. March 12, 2002). |
|
|
Civil Enforecment Actions |
August 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
July 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
July 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
June 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
June 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
April 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
April 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
March 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
March 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2010: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
November 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalites and Sanctions |
July 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
July 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
June 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
March 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
March 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2009: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
October 2008: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
August 2008: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
June 2008: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2008: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties & Sanctions |
January 2008: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
November 2007: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
October 2007: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
June 2007: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
May 2007: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties & Sanctions |
February 2007: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
December 2006: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
November 2006: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
August 2006: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
May 2006: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2006: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
November 2005: Recent Investigations,Settlements, Penalties and Sanction |
|
|
Civil Liability |
August 2006: Litigant’s Failure to Explicitly Raise an Issue Before the District Court Is Foreclosed from Raising the Issue for the First Time on Appeal Esso Standard Oil Company v. Carlos E. Rodriguez-Perez, ___F.3d___ 05-1722 (1st Cir. June 14, 2006) |
April 2005: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
February 2005: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions. |
August 2004: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
July 2004: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions. |
January 2004: District Court Affirms Administrative Judge’s Refusal to Consider PRP’s Evidence and Grants EPA Pre-Judgment Interest and Potentially Court Costs Titan Wheel Corporation of Iowa v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 4:02- CV-40352 (C.D. Iowa Nov. 10, 2003). |
1 December 2003: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
October 2003: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
|
|
Coal Ash |
|
|
|
Contractual Indemnity |
|
|
|
Contribution |
|
|
|
Cost Recovery Actions |
|
|
|
Criminal Enforcement Actions |
|
|
|
Criminal Liability |
December 2008: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2006: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties And Sanctions |
May 2005: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
March 2004: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2004: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
October 2003: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
May 2003: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
January 2002: Ninth Circuit Holds that Federal Government Retains RCRA Criminal Enforcement Authority in States with Delegated Programs United States v. Elias ___F.3d___, Case No. 00-30145 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2001) |
|
|
Criminal Penalties |
|
|
|
Definitions |
October 2007: Fifth Circuit Holds Owner of Part of Facility Has Standing to Sue under RCRA to Clean Up Entire Facility Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., ___F.3d___ 06-30570 (5th Cir. Aug. 28, 2007) |
June 2007: District Court Holds Asbestos Building Materials, Left Intact within the Structure, Do Not Constitute Disposed Materials under CERCLA or Solid Waste under RCRA Sycamore Industrial Park Associates v. Ericsson, Inc., ___F.Supp.2d___ 06 C 0768 (N.D. Ill., Mar. 30, 2007) |
August 2005: District Court Affirms EPA Regulations that Allow Shooting Ranges to Operate without a Discharge Permit under RCRA because Bullets Are Not ‘Abandoned’ Simsbury-Avon Pres. Soc’y, L.L.C. v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc., ___F.Supp.2d___ 3:02 CV 656 (JCH) (D. Conn. May 31, 2005) |
January 2004: Ninth Circuit Holds Environmental Consultant’s Documents Protected From Disclosure to Grand Jury Investigation under the Work Product Doctrine United States v. Torf ___ F.3d ____, Case Nos. 03- 30102, 03-30104, 03-30105, 03-30106, 03-30107 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2003). |
November 2003: Second Circuit Holds Cleanup Of New York City Post Office Anthrax Not An Emergency Removal Under Cercla APWU v. Potter ___F.3d___, Case No. 02-56186 (2nd Cir. Sept. 15, 2003). |
October 2003: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Challenge to Allegedly Overbroad Definition of Hazardous Waste American Chemistry Council v. Environmental Protection Agency ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-1216 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 8, 2003). |
|
|
Discharge Permits |
|
|
|
Discovery |
|
|
|
EDC |
|
|
|
Enforcement Actions |
|
|
|
Equipment Manufacturer Liability |
|
|
|
Expert Liability |
|
|
|
Federal Facilities Provision |
|
|
|
Federal Preemption |
|
|
|
Fixtures |
|
|
|
General |
October 2004: Puerto Rico Federal District Court Finds Individual Liable under Both CERCLA and RCRA United States v. JG-24, Jorge Ortiz, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ Civ. 00-1483 (D. P.R. Aug. 12, 2004) |
June 2003: D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA Rulemaking Under Project XL, Finding the Challenge Unripe Atlantic States Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency ___F.3d___, Case Nos. 99-1409 and 99-1414 (D.C. Cir. April 11, 2003). |
July 2002: The "Sludge" Boat? - The Efficacy of the Current Statutory and Enforcement Schemes to Regulate the Discharge of Waste Materials by the Cruise Ship Industry |
June 2002: Is the Door Slammed Shut?: A Recent California Decision Shows How Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Principles May Apply to the Discovery of New Contamination |
June 2002: Tanker Companies Must Reimburse State for Cost of Providing Alternate Water to Residents Due to Leaking USTs North Carolina v. Acme Petroleum ___F.3d___, Case No. 01-1665 (4th Cir. March 19, 2002). |
February 2001: Arizona Court Finds Feces Not a "contaminant" or "irritant" for Purposes of the Absolute Pollution Exclusion Clause Keggi v. Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance Company ___Az.App.___, 13 P.3d 785;2000 LEXIS 173 (Ariz. Dec. 5, 2000) |
January 2001: Court Declines to Vacate Opinion Regarding EPA Final Administrative Order when EPA Vacates Order before Appeal Is Heard Amoco Oil Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency ___F.3d___,No.99-1534 (10th Cir. Oct. 31, 2000) |
|
|
Hazardous Waste |
June 2009: District Court Rejects Chemical Manufacturer’s Attempt to Rely on State Regulation in Order to Avoid Obtaining a RCRA Permit U.S. v Rineco Chemical Industries, Inc., ___F. Supp.2d___ 4:07 cv001189 (E.D. Ar March 4, 2009) |
June 2006: Dallas, Texas Capitulates to EPA, Will Invest $3.5 Million in Bolstering Its Inadequate Stormwater System, and Pay $800,000 Fine |
August 2005: Recent Investigations, Settlements, Penalties and Sanctions |
August 2004: Fourth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Direct CERCLA Action Against Insurers Providing Financial Assurances Required by RCRA South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. Commerce and Industry Insurance Co.___ F.3d ___ 03-1329 (4th Cir. June 8, 2004) |
|
|
Hazardous Waste Fuel Blending |
|
|
|
Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Provision |
|
|
|
Injunctive Relief |
May 2010: District Court Grants Injunction under RCRA in Kentucky Petroleum Solid Waste Case Kentucky Oil and Refining Company v. W.E.L., Inc., ___F.Supp.2d___ 7:09-148 (E.D. KY March 8, 2010) |
April 2010: District Court Clarifies Grounds for Preliminary Injunctions under RCRA REV 973 LLC v. Mouren-Laurens, ___F.Supp.2d___ 98-10690, (C.D. Cal. 2010) |
November 2009: Seventh Circuit Holds a RCRA Injunction Is Not Dischargeable in Bankruptcy U.S. v. Apex Oil, ___F.3d___ Case No. 08-3433 (7th Cir. 2009) |
January 2004: District Court in Louisiana Holds that RCRA Citizen Suit May Be Used to Enjoin Future Conduct Holy Cross v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ___F.Supp.2d___, Case No. 03-370 Section “L”(4) (E.D. La. Nov. 3, 2003). |
August 2002: D.C. Circuit Finds Environmental Groups Lack Standing to Challenge U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RCRA Rulemaking Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, ___F.3d___, Case No.01-1057 (D.C.Cir.June 18, 2002). |
July 2001: Second Circuit Court of Appeals Interprets RCRA in Denying Request to Enjoin Pesticide Spraying Program Intended to Control West Nile Virus No Spray Coalition v. The City of New York ___F.3d___,Case No.00-9368,(2nd. Cir., June 5, 2001) |
|
|
Insurer Liability |
|
|
|
Intended Use Exception |
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
July 2009: District Court Holds Alleging Violations of RCRA as Part of a Civil Conspiracy Claim Does Not Present a Federal Question for Jurisdiction Giles, et al. v. Chicago Drum, Inc., et al., ___F. Supp.2d___ 08 C 4654, 08 C 4657, No. 08 C 4660 (N.D. Ill. April 22, 2009) |
July 2008: Eleventh Circuit Holds RCRA Jurisdictional Bar Applies to Remedial Actions on Non-NPL-Listed Federal Facilities OSI, Inc. v. U.S., ___F.3d___ 07-10941 (11th Cir. May 5, 2008) |
December 2007: District Court Lacks Jurisdiction over RCRA Citizen-Suit Requesting Remediation Beyond that Required by EPA under CERCLA Public Service Company of Colorado v. Schrader Oil Company, ___F.Supp.2d___ 05-CV-0785 (D. Colo. Oct. 10, 2007) |
|
|
Jury Instructions |
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
|
Military Pollution |
|
|
|
Mining |
|
|
|
Mitigation of Damages |
|
|
|
MTBE |
|
|
|
Notice |
|
|
|
Owner Liability |
|
|
|
PCE |
|
|
|
Permit by Rule Exception |
|
|
|
Petroleum Hydrocarbons |
|
|
|
Phosphorous |
|
|
|
Pleading |
|
|
|
Poultry Litter |
April 2010: District Court Finds that Poultry Litter Is Not a ‘Solid Waste’ under the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act State of Oklahoma, v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., ___F. Supp.2d___ 05-CV-329-GFK (N.D. Ok, Feb. 17, 2010) |
July 2009: Tenth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Determination of Insufficient Link between ‘Poultry Litter’ and Alleged Contamination of Illinois River Watershed State of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ 08-5154 (10th Cir. May 13, 2009) |
|
|
Pre-Enactment Liability |
|
|
|
Prevailing Party |
|
|
|
Proximate Cause |
|
|
|
Radioactive Waste |
|
|
|
Reasonable Prospect of Future Harm |
|
|
|
Record Keeping Duty |
|
|
|
Recyling Process Exemption |
|
|
|
Remediation Plan |
|
|
|
Report Filing Duty |
|
|
|
Res Judicata |
|
|
|
Section 9604 Jurisidictional Bar |
|
|
|
Shooting Ranges and Ammunition |
|
|
|
Solvents |
|
|
|
Sovereign Immunity |
|
|
|
Standing |
November 2009: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Gun Range/Lead Pollution Suit under the Clean Water Act, RCRA and CERCLA for Lack of Standing Pollack v. U.S. Department of Justice, ___F.3d___ 08-3857 (7th Cir. 2009) |
October 2009: Seventh Circuit Denies Standing for Lake Michigan Pollution Blue Eco Legal Council, et al. v. U.S. Department of Justice, ___F.3d___ 08-3857 (7th Cir. Aug. 13, 2009) |
October 2007: Fifth Circuit Holds Owner of Part of Facility Has Standing to Sue under RCRA to Clean Up Entire Facility Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., ___F.3d___ 06-30570 (5th Cir. Aug. 28, 2007) |
February 2007: First Circuit Finds Reasonable Prospect of Future Harm Raises Citizen Suit Standing under RCRA Maine People’s Alliance and Natural Resources Defense Council v. Mallinckrodt, ___F.3d___ 05-2331 (1st Cir. Dec. 22, 2006) |
October 2006: District Court Finds Environmental Group Has Standing to Challenge Gun Club under the Clean Water Act for Alleged Discharges Simsbury-Avon Preservation Society v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc., ___F.Supp.2d___ 3:04cv803 (D. Conn. Aug. 23, 2006) |
June 2006: Second Circuit Finds Union Has Standing but Failed to Properly Plead Clean Water Act Claim Building and Construction Trades Council of Buffalo, New York and Vicinity v. Downtown Development, Inc., ___F.3d___ 04-4865-CV (2nd Cir. May 6, 2006) |
January 2006: Declarations Regarding Possible Fair Market Value Loss of Member’s Home Is Insufficient to Establish ‘Standing’ to Sue EPA under Alleged RCRA Violation GrassRoots Recycling Network, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ___F.3d___ 04-1196 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 18, 2005) |
June 2005: District Court Grants Motions to Dismiss Third- Party Defendants under RCRA, where Complainants Had No Standing and Indemnity Agreements Precluded Claims FCA Associates v. Texaco, Inc. et al., ___F.Supp.2d___ 03-CV-0683T(W.D. N.Y March 31, 2005) |
March 2004: Ninth Circuit May Have Found Global Standing for Ozone Citizen Suits Covington v. Jefferson County, State of Idaho, District 7 Health Department ___F.3d___, Case No. 02-36000 (9th Cir. Feb. 5, 2004). |
|
|
Statute of Limitations |
|
|
|
Successor Liability |
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Underground Storage Tanks |
|
|
|
Useful Product Defense |
|
|
|
VCM |
|
|
|
Volatile Organic Compounds VOCs |
|
|
|
Wholly Past Doctrine |
|
|
|
|