|RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS|
District Court Dismisses Complaint Challenging South Lake Tahoe’s General Plan for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
To read this entire item of approximately 3000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
League to Save Lake Tahoe v. City of South Lake Tahoe, ___F.Supp.2d___
On January 19, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed the League to Save Lake Tahoe’s (League) First Amendment claims challenging the City of South Lake Tahoe and the city council of the City of South Lake Tahoe’s (Lake Tahoe or city) approval of its General Plan Update for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
Read related items on:
Topics) Land Use) General Plans
Eastern District of California
League to Save Lake Tahoe v. City of South Lake Tahoe