 | | EASTERN WATER NEWS |
January 2011
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1500 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
News from the West
This month’s News from the West covers cases from California, Washington, and Montana. In the California case, the Court of Appeal ruled that judicially allocated water rights can be used as the baseline in determining the effects of a project under environmental review.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - State) California) California Environmental Quality Act
Topics) Land Use) Water Supply
Topics) Water Rights) Administration
Topics) Water Rights) Appropriative Rights
Topics) Water Rights) Beneficial Use Doctrine
Topics) Water Rights) Change Applications
Topics) Water Rights) Instream Water Rights
2nd District Court of Appeal
Montana Supreme Court
Washington Supreme Court
Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. City of Beaumont
Hohenlohe v. Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation
Lummi Indian Naiton v. State of Washington
|
