 | | EASTERN WATER NEWS |
December 2010
|
To read this entire item of approximately 2000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
News from the West
In this month’s News from the West, a California court gives deference to a water agency’s preparation of an “urban water management plan” and upholds the plan. The Washington Supreme Court reaffirms that the common enemy rule is no protection from an inverse condemnation claim based on flooding from a blocked natural watercourse.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Topics) Flood Control) Common Enemy Doctrine of Liability
Topics) Flood Control) Inverse Condemnation
Topics) Flood Control) Liability
Topics) Land Use) Urban Water Management Plans
Topics) Water Rights) Administration
Topics) Water Supply) Urban Water Management Plans
California) Sonoma County
Oregon) Okanogan County
Hawaii Court of Appeals
Washington Supreme Court
Hawaii Commission on Water Resource Management
Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan County
In re Water Use Permit Applications and Petitions for Water Reservations for Waiahole Ditch
Sonoma County Water Coalition v. Sonoma County Water Agency
|
