 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
April 2010
|
To read this entire item of approximately 2000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
First District Holds City’s Agreement to Provide Municipal Services to Proposed Tribal Casino Not a Project under CEQA
Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of Richmond, ___Cal.App.4th___
Reversing a trial court’s decision, the First District Court of Appeal recently held that the City of Richmond did not violate the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it entered into a municipal services agreement (MSA) for a tribal casino outside the city’s boundaries without conducting environmental review.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) California Environmental Quality Act
Topics) Indian Tribes) Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Topics) Land Use) Indian Casinos
Topics) Land Use) Municipal Services Agreement
California) Richmond
1st District Court of Appeal
Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of Richmond
|