 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
October 2009
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1800 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Ninth Circuit Affirms Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation of U.S. Forest Service’s State Petitions Rule
People of the State of California v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, ___F.3d.__
On August 5, 2009, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an order of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California permanently enjoining implementation of the State Petitions Rule promulgated by the Unites States Forest Service because the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). More specifically, the Ninth Circuit found that the Forest Service’s use of a categorical exemption to repeal the nationwide protections of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule and to invite states to pursue varying rules for roadless area management was unreasonable. The Ninth Circuit further found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the Forest Service to comply with the Roadless Rule as a remedy.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Endangered Species Act) Forest Lands
Statutes - Federal) National Forest Management Act) Roadless Area Conservation Rule
Topics) Litigation) Injunctive Relief
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Roadless Area Conservation Rule
State Petitions Rule
State of California v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
|