 | | EASTERN WATER NEWS |
October 2009
|
To read this entire item of approximately 3000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
News from the West
This month’s news from the West involves cases from Washington, Arizona and California. First, the Washington Court of Appeals determined whether a surface water right was subject to an exception to relinquishment due to foreclosure proceedings. Second, the U.S. District Court for Arizona ruled that the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River does not adversely modify humpback chub habitat. Finally, the California Supreme Court found that the state’s Safe Drinking Water Act did not imply a mandatory duty on a county to warn residents of reported water contamination.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Endangered Species Act) Humpback Chub
Statutes - Federal) Safe Drinking Water Act) Notice
Topics) Water Rights) Abandonment
Arizona) Glen Canyon Dam
California) Monterey County
Washington) All State
District of Arizona
California Supreme Court
Washington Court of Appeals
Endangered Species
Washington State Department of Ecology
Grand Canyon Trust v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
Guzman v. County of Monterey
Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Washington Department of Ecology
|