 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
July 2009
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1500 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss CERCLA Claims against ‘Owner and Operator’ where Party Was an Owner Only
Board of County Commissioners of County of La Plata, Colorado v. Brown Group Retail Inc., ___F.Supp.2d___
The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado denied plaintiff and cross-defendant La Plata County’s motion to dismiss defendant and crosscomplainant Brown Group’s counterclaim under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) because La Plata County was the current owner of the contaminated property even if it did not “operate” the facility.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Operator Liability
Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Owner Liability
Colorado) La Plata County
District of Colorado
Board of County Commissioners, La Plata County v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.
|