 | | JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS |
March 2009
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1200 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Colorado Supreme Court Imposes New Quantification Requirement for the Adverse Possession of Water Rights
Archuleta v. Gomez
In this case, the Colorado Supreme Court imposed a new condition on adverse possession of water rights: that the claimant quantify the actual historic beneficial consumptive use of the claimed water right. This dispute concerned ditch easement rights and ownership of water rights. The Colorado Supreme Court reversed the Division 2 Water Court’s ruling that the defendant, Theodore Gomez, adversely possessed plaintiff Ralph Archuleta’s water rights and thereby extinguished Archuleta’s ditch easements over Gomez’s property. The Water Court concluded that neither party met their burden of proof and remanded the case for factual findings on historic beneficial use imposing a new requirement for adverse possession claimants. In Colorado, a water right owner has a right to a ditch easement across the land of another, if necessary, to convey water. On remand, Archuleta must show historic use to avoid abandonment of his water right and right to an easement. For adverse possession, Gomez must show actual beneficial use of Archuleta’s water rights over and above use of his own water rights. On remand, the Water Court must now quantify the historic beneficial use amounts and determine how much, if any, has been adversely possessed by Gomez and how much has been abandoned and/or retained by Archuleta.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Land Use) Adverse Possession
Topics) Land Use) Easements
Topics) Water Rights) Adverse Possession
Colorado) All State
Colorado Supreme Court
Archuleta v. Gomez
|