 | | RECENT STATE DECISIONS |
March 2009
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1600 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
California Court of Appeal Overrules Industry Challenge to Inclusion of Phthalate on Proposition 65 List of Chemicals Known to Cause Reproductive Toxicity
Exxon Mobile Corporation v. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, et al., ___Cal. App.4th___
Recently, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s denial of Plaintiff Exxon Mobile Corporation’s petition for writ of mandate challenging the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s listing of di-isodecyl phthalate as a chemical known to cause reproductive health under Proposition 65.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) Proposition 65
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Di Isodecyl Phthalate
California) All State
2nd District Court of Appeal
Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment
Exxon Mobile Corporation v. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
|