 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
January 2009
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Second Circuit Finds Conversion to Motion for Summary Judgment Was without Adequate Notice
Sahu v. Union Carbide Corporation, ___F.3d___
Plaintiff property owners brought suit against defendants, a parent company and an executive, to recover for injuries allegedly caused by a plant owned by Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL), a former subsidiary of the parent company, defendant Union Carbide. Without explicitly notifying the parties, the District Court converted defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss to a Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment and dismissed most of plaintiffs’ claims. The Second Circuit held that the District Court erred when it converted defendants’ motion to dismiss to one for summary judgment without adequate notice.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Litigation) Motion to Dismiss
Topics) Litigation) Summary Judgment
India) Bhopal
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
Sahu v. Union Carbide Corp.
|