 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
November 2008
|
To read this entire item of approximately 2000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Rules that General Liability Insurers Have a Duty to Defend when Sudden and Accidental Nature of Release Is Ambiguous
Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co., ___ F.Supp.2d ___
On September 2, 2008, in Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co., the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland interpreted a common pollution liability exclusion and a “sudden and accidental” exception to that exclusion in a comprehensive general liability policy, and it reaffirmed Maryland’s requirement that insurers defend their insureds if the potential for coverage exists, even if that potential is remote.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) National Priorities List
Topics) Insurance) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance
Topics) Insurance) Duty to Defend
Topics) Insurance) Pollution Endorsement Policy
Maryland) All State
District of Maryland
Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.
|