 | | RECENT STATE DECISIONS |
October 2008
|
To read this entire item of approximately 2000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Third District Court Lowers Standard to Obtain “Candidate” Species Status under State Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. California Fish and Game Commission, ___Cal.App.4th___
A California Court of Appeal decision has effectively lowered the standard for placing a species on the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) “candidate species” list. On September 2, 2008, the Third District Court of Appeal ruled that the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) is required to place a species on the candidate species list and give full consideration to a petition to list a species as endangered or threatened if there is “a substantial possibility that the requested listing could occur.” The decision establishes a relatively low bar for environmental groups and other petitioners to meet to have new species receive interim protection under CESA.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) California Endangered Species Act
Topics) Endangered Species) Tiger Salamander
California) All State
3rd District Court of Appeal
California Department of Fish and Game
California Fish and Game Commission
Center for Biological Diversity v. California Fish and Game Commission
|