 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
October 2008
|
To read this entire item of approximately 3000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Eleventh Circuit Reverses/Remands District Court Order—Finds Insurance Company Not Responsible for Providing Defense to Engineering Firm Due to Pollution Exclusion Clause
James River Ins. Co. v. Ground Down Engineering, Inc., ___F.3d___
The Eleventh Circuit reversed a District Court decision to dismiss an insurance company’s complaint for declaratory relief that the policy’s “pollution exclusion” clause precluded claims relating to professional negligence. The Court of Appeals remanded the case with instructions, holding that the insurance company was not responsible for providing an environmental engineering firm with a legal defense in a suit brought by a property owner against the environmental engineering firm (as well as the prior business owner) due to the “pollution exclusion” provision contained in the insurance policy.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Insurance) Pollution Exclusion
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Consultants
11th Circuit Court of Appeals
James River Insurance Co. v. Ground Down Engineering, Inc.
|