 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
August 2008
|
To read this entire item of approximately 2000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Third District Court Holds Sacramento County Decision to Close Airport Not Preempted by State Law but Is a ‘Project’ Subject to CEQA Review
Sunset Skyranch Pilots Association v. County of Sacramento, ___Cal.App.4th___
On July 2, 2008, the Third District Court of Appeal held that state law did not compel Sacramento County to renew a conditional use permit for operation of an airport, but did find that denial of the permit was a “project” requiring environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - State) California) California Aeronautics Act
Statutes - State) California) California Environmental Quality Act
Topics) Land Use) Airport Land
Topics) Land Use) Conditional Use Permits
Topics) Litigation) Preemption Doctrine
California) Elk Grove
3rd District Court of Appeal
Sunset Skyranch Pilots Association v. County of Sacramento
|
