 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
May 2008
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1500 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
First District Finds in Eminent Domain, Owners of Residence Not Entitled to Temporary Severance Damages Where No Evidence of Actual Injury Is Presented
City of Fremont v. Fisher
On February 28, 2008, the First District Court of Appeal held that George and Elizabeth Lee Fisher, the owners of a single-family residence in the City of Fremont (Fremont), were not entitled to temporary severance damages resulting from Fremont’s condemnation of a temporary construction easement over their property. In addition to overturning the severance damage award, the court remanded the matter for reconsideration of the trial court’s award of litigation expenses to the Fishers.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Eminent Domain) Severance Damages
Topics) Land Use) Eminent Domain
California) Fremont
1st District Court of Appeal
City of Fremont v. Fisher
|