 | | LAWSUITS FILED OR PENDING |
December 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1500 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Coastkeeper Suit Claims Department of Fish and Game Lags in Recommending Protective Instream Flows
California Coastkeeper Alliance v. McCamman
On October 9th, 2007 the California Coastkeeper Alliance, representing 12 nonprofit Waterkeeper groups, filed a petition for writ of mandate in the Sacramento County Superior Court against the California Department of Fish and Game. The petition alleges that the agency’s instream flow program, required by law to include studies and recommendations to protect fish and wildlife, has failed to meet the statutory requirements for 25 years.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Water Rights) Administration
Topics) Water Rights) Appropriative Rights
Topics) Water Rights) Streamflows
California) All State
Sacramento County Superior Court
California Department of Fish and Game
State Water Resources Control Board
California Coastkeeper Alliance v. McCamman
|