 | | JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS |
November 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1600 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Colorado High Court Finds Colorado’s ‘Injury’ to Water Rights Analysis Needn’t Be Exact—Can Rest on Undisputed Reasonable Predictions and Assumptions
Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. Simpson
In this case, the Colorado Supreme Court examined the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority’s (UERWA) application for augmentation and exchange that would allow out-of-priority depletions to serve customers within its service area. After reviewing the evidence, the Court affirmed the Water Court’s decision, ruling that UERWA’s application would not cause injury to other water rights, and claim preclusion did not bar the consideration of changed circumstances surrounding earlier dated engineering tables.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) Colorado) Colorado Water Right Determination and Administrative Act
Topics) Water Rights) Administration
Topics) Water Rights) Augmentation Plans
Colorado) All State
Colorado Supreme Court
Colorado Water Conservation Board
Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority
Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. Simpson
|