 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
October 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Third District Court Prohibits State Water Resources Control Board Counsel from Acting as Both Prosecutor and Advisor
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. State Water Resources Control Board, 153
Recently, the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District held that a water right holder, in a revocation proceeding, is deprived of due process where the prosecuting attorney simultaneously acts as a legal advisor to the same agency, even if in an unrelated administrative proceeding.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Attorneys) Conflict of Interest
Topics) Public Agencies) Conflict of Interest
Topics) United States Constitution) Due Process
Topics) Water Rights) Administration
Topics) Water Rights) Agency Revocation
California) All State
3rd District Court of Appeal
State Water Resources Control Board
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Water Resources Control Board
|