 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
June 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1300 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Construes Indemnity Clause to Include Costs Associated with Voluntary Remediation
Master Lock Company v. Hawn, ___F.Supp.2d___
After completing Illinois’ voluntary Site Remediation Program, plaintiff sued defendant, the former owner and operator of the site, under an environmental indemnity clause contained in the merger agreement. Called on to construe the terms “losses” and “cleanup costs,” the District Court held that the indemnity clause did not preclude recovery of voluntary but necessary remediation costs.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) Illinois) Illinois Environmental Protection Act
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Indemnity Agreements
Illinois) Crete
Northern District of Illinois
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Master Lock Co. v. Hawn
|