About Argentco.com




About Argentco.com



RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

June 2007
To read this entire item of approximately 1200 words online now in PDF format:
  • Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
  • Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
  • To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
  • PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
  • Ninth Circuit Holds Use of Recycled Sewage Effluent to Make Artificial Snow Violates Religious Freedom Restoration Act and NEPA

    Navajo Nation, et al. v. U.S. Forest Service, et al., ___ F.3d ___

    In an effort to expand a ski area located in the San Francisco Peaks in northern Arizona and reduce the area’s dependence on natural snowfall, the Arizona Snowbowl Resort Limited Partnership (Snowbowl) proposed making artificial snow from recycled sewage effluent. The Snowbowl proposed bringing 1.5 million gallons per day of treated sewage effluent from the City of Flagstaff to the ski area through a 14.8-mile pipeline. The proposal included construction of a reservoir with a surface area of 1.9 acres, large enough to hold 10 million gallons of treated sewage effluent. The Snowbowl proposed using artificial snow made from the effluent to build a base layer covering the ski area at the beginning of the ski season. The Snowbowl would also use the effluent to make additional snow during the rest of the season, as needed. Under the Snowbowl’s proposal, over 200 acres in the San Francisco Peaks would receive the sewage effluent. Depending on the snowfall in a particular season, up to 100 million gallons of effluent could be deposited on the San Francisco Peaks in a year.


    The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
    Read related items on:
    Statutes - Federal) Religious Freedom and Restoration Act) Water Quality
    Topics) Water Quality) Artificial Snow
    Arizona) San Francisco Peaks
    9th Circuit Court of Appeals
    Navajo Nation, et al. v. U.S. Forest Service

    © Argent & Schuster, Inc. All rights reserved.
    All information contained in the Argent Communications Group website is protected by copyright law.
    Copyright policy
    Contact: (800) 419-2741 - E-mail: Click Here