 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
April 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 800 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Rules that CERCLA Does Not Preempt State Common Law Claims for Cost Recovery
New York v. Ametek, Inc., ___ F.Supp.2d ___
On January 18, 2007, in New York v. Ametek, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held that state common law claims seeking recovery of cleanup costs are not preempted by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Cost Recovery
Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Preemption Doctrine
Topics) Litigation) Preemption Doctrine
New York) New York
Southern District of New York
New York State v. Ametek, Inc.
|
