 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
April 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1400 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Ninth Circuit Determines Best Management Practices May Be Used Instead of Numerical Limits For Storm Water Discharges
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division, ___F.3d___
On March 8, 2007 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, determined that mere adjacency of a waste discharge pond to a navigable water of the United States did not confer Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. The waste discharge pond was not considered to be a wetland for purpose of the court’s analysis and the court interpreted Supreme Court CWA precedent to limit the adjacency principle to wetlands.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Adjacent Waters
Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Best Management Practices
Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Jurisdiction
Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Waters of the United States
Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Wetlands
Topics) Wetlands) Administration
California) San Francisco Bay
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division
|