 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
March 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1600 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Declares California’s Automotive Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations Preempted by the Clean Air Act
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, et al. v. Witherspoon, et al., ___F.Supp.2d___
Following California’s adoption of regulations imposing greenhouse gas emissions reduction standards on new motor vehicles, members of the automotive industry filed suit seeking to enjoin enforcement of the state standards. The State of California filed motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ preemption, dormant commerce clause and Sherman Act Claims. Following the court’s order granting defendants’ motion respecting plaintiffs’ Sherman Act and dormant commerce clause claims, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds of ripeness.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Clean Air Act) Greenhouse Gases
Statutes - Federal) Clean Air Act) Preemption Doctrine
Statutes - Federal) Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005) Emissions Standards
Statutes - State) California) AB 1493
Topics) Litigation) Preemption Doctrine
California) All State
Eastern District of California
Emissions Standards
California Air Resources Board
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, et al. v. Witherspoon, et al
|