 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
January 2007
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1650 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Rules that Complete Ban on Land Application of Biosolids Likely Is Preempted by State Law, Violates Dormant Commerce Clause, and Exceeds County’s Police Powers
City of Los Angeles et al. v. Kern County et al., ___F.Supp.2d___
On October 24, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that four of six claims in a lawsuit by the City of Los Angeles and others challenging Kern County’s blanket ban on land application of biosolids could survive a motion to dismiss. On November 20, 2006, the court ruled that plaintiffs are likely to prevail on three of those remaining claims, warranting issuance of a preliminary injunction.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) California Integrated Waste Management Act
Topics) Land Use) Biosolids
Topics) Land Use) Propositions and Intiatives
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Biosolids
Topics) United States Constitution) Dormant Commerce Clause
California) Kern County
Central District of California
City of Los Angeles, et al. v. Kern County, et al.
|