 | | FEATURE ARTICLE |
December 2006
|
To read this entire item of approximately 2600 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Colorado Supreme Court Expands on the ‘Can and Will’ Doctrine in Canceling Major Storage Conditional Water Rights
In the case, Natural Energy Resources Company v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, 142 P.3d 1265 (Colo. 2006), applicant/appellant Natural Energy Resources Company (NECO) sought a finding of reasonable diligence for its conditional storage water rights in the proposed Union Park Reservoir.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Water Projects) Union Park Reservoir
Topics) Water Rights) Can and Will Doctrine
Topics) Water Rights) Conditional Water Rights
Topics) Water Supply) Transfers
Colorado) Union Park Reservoir
Colorado Supreme Court
Natural Energy Resources Company v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District
|