 | | FEATURE ARTICLE |
October 2006
|
To read this entire item of approximately 3075 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Alice in Groundwater Land: Court Defines State Board ‘Subterranean Stream’ Jurisdiction
There will always be great difficulty in fixing a line, beyond which the water in the sand and gravels over which a stream flows and which supply or behold the stream, ceases to be part thereof and becomes what is called percolating water. (Hudson v. Dailey, 156 Cal. 617, 627-28 (1909).)
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Water Rights) Administration
Topics) Water Rights) Groundwater
California) Gualala
California) Mendocino County
1st District Court of Appeal
North Gualala Water Company
State Water Resources Control Board
North Gualala Water Company v. California State Water Resources Control Board
|