 | | JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS |
August 2006
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1575 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Second Circuit Ruling that New York City Must Obtain an NPDES Permit when Transferring Water between Distinct Waterbodies Appears in Conflict with EPA’s Proposed Water Transfer Rule
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. City of New York, ___F.3d___
On June 13, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion that is virtually certain to perpetuate the recent flurry of litigation under § 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). In Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. City of New York, the Second Circuit affirmed its own 2001 decision by again holding that New York City must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit when transferring water between distinct waterbodies via a tunnel to support its municipal drinking water system.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Topics) Water Quality) Interbasin Water Transfers
Topics) Water Supply) Transfers
New York) New York City
New York) Schoharie Reservoir
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
Clean Water Act
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. City of New York
|