About Argentco.com




About Argentco.com



RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS

April 2006
To read this entire item of approximately 1250 words online now in PDF format:
  • Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
  • Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
  • To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
  • PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
  • Incidental Fallback Dredging Regulations Are Ripe for Review Despite Requirement to Prove Volume of Redeposited Material with Project-Specific Evidence

    National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ___F.Spp.2d___

    Under § 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’(Corps) promulgated regulations covering the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. See Further Revisions to the Clean Water Act Regulatory Definition of “Discharge of Dredged Material,” 66 Fed. Reg. 4550, 4575 (Jan 17, 2001) (codified at 33 C.F.R. § 323.3). (The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also promulgated an identical regulation governing the discharge of pollutants other than dredged and fill material. 40 C.F.R. § 232.2.) A number of industry groups, lead by the National Home Builders Association, challenged the regulation in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The District Court dismissed the case on the grounds that it was not ripe for review. National Ass’n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 311 F.Supp.2d 91 (D. D.C. 2004). On appeal, the D.C. Circuit reversed, holding that the regulation was ripe for review because the core issues are purely legal and do not depend upon case-by-case findings. As result, the D.C. Circuit remanded the case to the District Court for consideration of the merits of the Industry’s challenge.


    The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
    Read related items on:
    Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Dredge and Fill "Incidental Fallback
    Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Dredge and Fill Permits
    District of Columbia
    Clean Water Act
    National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

    © Argent & Schuster, Inc. All rights reserved.
    All information contained in the Argent Communications Group website is protected by copyright law.
    Copyright policy
    Contact: (800) 419-2741 - E-mail: Click Here