 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
March 2006
|
To read this entire item of approximately 900 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Second District Holds Regulatory Taking Claim Is Ripe when County Denies Application to Subdivide Parcel into Two Residential Lots
Dunn v. County of Santa Barbara, ___Cal.App.4th___
The Second District Court of Appeal held that a property owner’s regulatory taking claim is ripe for judicial review after the county denies the owner’s application to subdivide a parcel into two residential lots based upon the presence of a small isolated wetland.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - Federal) Coastal Zone Management Act) Coastal Zone Management Programs
Statutes - Federal) United States Constitution) Takings Clause
Statutes - State) California) California Coastal Act
Topics) Land Use) Coastal Lands
Topics) Land Use) Local Coastal Program
Topics) Land Use) Takings
Topics) Takings Clause) Coastal Lands
California) Summerland
2nd District Court of Appeal
Coastal Commission
Dunn v. County of Santa Barbara
|
