 | | JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS |
February 2006
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1700 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Colorado Water Court Finds It Could Not Determine whether Selective Subordination Would Occur—Retains Jurisdiction over Issue
In Re Application for the Eagle Park Reservoir Company
As discussed previously in the article entitled “Water Diversions, Water Rights Selective Subordination Issues in Water Court Litigation Move to the Colorado Supreme Court,” (9 West. Water L. & Pol’y Rptr. 357 (Oct. 2005)), Water Courts for Water Division Nos. 1 and 5 have recently handed down conflicting decisions regarding the public notice required to include a “selective subordination” within a water decree.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Water Rights) Jurisdiction
Topics) Water Rights) Notice Provisions
Topics) Water Rights) Selective Subordination Rule
Colorado) Gypsum
Division 5, Colorado Water Court
Lake Creek Metropolitan District
In Re Application for teh Eagle Park Reservior Company
|