 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
October 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1900 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
First and Fourth Districts Reach Different Results on Private Attorney General Fee Awards where Petitioners Achieve Limited CEQA Claims Success
Bowman v. City of Berkeley
In two recent attorney fee award cases involving the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), the First and Fourth District Courts of Appeal came to different conclusions regarding whether petitioners that achieve only limited success on their claims may be awarded their attorney’s fees under the private attorney general doctrine codified in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) California Environmental Quality Act
Statutes - State) California) Private Attorney General Statute
Topics) Attorney's Fees) California Environmental Quality Act
Topics) Attorney's Fees) Private Attorney General Doctrine
Topics) Litigation) Attorneys Fees
California) Berkeley
California) La Habra
1st District Court of Appeal
4th District Court of Appeal
Bowman v. Berkeley
Concerned Citzens of La Habra v. City of La Habra
|