 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
August 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1600 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
U.S. Supreme Court Holds that State Court Decision on Fifth Amendment Takings Claim Precludes Later Federal Court Review
San Remo Hotel, L.P., et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al., ___U.S.___
On June 20, 2005, the United States Supreme Court upheld a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that a hotel owner was precluded from challenging the constitutionality of a city’s hotel conversion ordinance under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment in federal court because the California state courts had already decided the takings claims under the tenets of federal takings law.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Land Use) Takings
Topics) Litigation) Full Faith and Credit Doctrine
Topics) Litigation) Ripeness Doctrine
Topics) Takings Clause) Hotel Property
Topics) Takings Clause) Ripeness Doctrine
Topics) United States Constitution) Takings
California) San Francisco
United States Supreme Court
San Remo Hotel, L.P., et. al, v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
|