 | | JUDICAL DEVELOPMENTS |
July 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1250 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Colorado Supreme Court Distinguishes Contractual Water Delivery Rights from True Water Rights
East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. The Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company, ___P.3d___
In this case, the Colorado Supreme Court revisited the rights and obligations afforded to contractual water delivery rights as opposed to water rights owned in fee, under a rather unique factual background. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC (East Ridge) was a successor in interest to two contracts affording it certain delivery rights to water. East Ridge filed a declaratory judgement action in water court seeking a declaration that the water delivered under the contracts was not perpetually tied to irrigation of certain lands, but rather was a water right capable of being changed to different places and types of use.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Water Rights) Transfers
Colorado) Cache La Poudre River
Colorado Supreme Court
Larimer and Weld Irrigation Co
East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. The Larimer and Weld Irrigation Co.
|