 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
June 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 900 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Dismisses Insurers Claims against Federal Government on Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
American Int’l Specialty Lines Insurance Co. v. U.S., ___F.Supp.2d___
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed an insurer’s indemnification and subrogation claims against the United States and the U.S. Department of Navy for soil cleanup. Specifically the indemnification claims were under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Claims Court and the CERCLA claims were not yet ripe.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Cleanup Costs
Statutes - Federal) Tucker Act) Contract Claims
Topics) Insurance) Subrogation
Topics) Litigation) Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction
California) Alameda
Northern District of California
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission
Department of The Navy
Alameda Reuse and Development Authority
Department of Toxic Substances Control
American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co. v. United States, et al.
|
