 | | JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS |
April 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1820 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Colorado Supreme Court Revisits the Standards for Approval of Augmentation Plans and Clarifies When Attorneys Fees and Costs Are Available
In the Matter of the Application of Water Rights of Park County Sportsmen’s Ranch: City of Aurora v. State Engineer
In this case, the Applicants-Appellants Park County Sportsmen’s Ranch, LLP (PCSR), Kenneth J. Burke (PCSR’s attorney at trial) and the City of Aurora appealed from a judgment of the Division 1 water court dismissing their water rights application and awarding attorney fees and costs to opposers to the application.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Litigation) Expert Witnesses
Topics) Water Rights) Attorney's Fees and Costs
Topics) Water Rights) Change Applications
Topics) Water Rights) Groundwater
Colorado) South Park
Colorado Supreme Court
City of Aurora v. Colorado State Engineer
In The Matter of the Application of Water Rights of Park County Sportsment's Ranch
|