 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
March 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1240 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Citizens’ Petition to Compel City to Process Coastal Development Permit Is Not a SLAPP Suit despite Pending Appeal of State-Adopted Local Coastal Plan
Visher v. City of Malibu, ___Cal.App.4th___
The Second District Court of Appeal recently upheld a Los Angeles County Superior Court’s decision denying the City of Malibu’s motion to strike as a SLAPP suit a citizens’ petition for writ of mandate seeking to force the city to process their coastal development permit. The Court of Appeal also upheld the trial court’s award of $35,000 in attorneys’ fees to the Vishers on the ground that the city’s motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statutes was frivolous and made in bad faith.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) Anti-SLAPP
Topics) Land Use) Coastal Lands
Topics) Land Use) Local Coastal Program
Topics) Land Use) SLAPP Suits
Topics) Litigation) SLAPP Suits
California) Malibu
2nd District Court of Appeal
Coastal Commission
Visher v. City of Malibu
|