 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
February 2005
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1700 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Second District Court Clarifies the Meaning of a “Big Box Retailer” under AB 178.
City of Carson v. City of La Mirada,
On December 30, 2004, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District reversed the Superior Court’s ruling, finding that the court’s interpretation and application of AB 178 was in legal error. The Court of Appeal confirmed that Corporate Express, Inc. is a “big box retailer” under AB 178 because of its physical size and ability to generate sizable retail sales taxes under the Revenue and Taxation Code.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) AB 178
Topics) Land Use) "Big Box" Retail Stores
Topics) Land Use) Bills and Proposed Legislation
Topics) Land Use) Taxation
Topics) Taxation) "Big Box" Retailers
California) Carson
California) La Mirada
2nd District Court of Appeal
City of Carson v. City of La Mirada
|