 | | FEATURE ARTICLE |
May 2004
|
To read this entire item of approximately 4000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Complying More Cheaply—Reducing the Expense of Environmental Penalties and Fines
This article addresses methods by which a corporation facing environmental penalties or fines may reduce the ultimate cost of that expense. For years, conventional wisdom has been that a potentially responsible party (PRP) cannot deduct an environmental fine or sanction. Section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue Code would at first blush seem to support this conclusion (“no deduction shall be allowed under subsection (a) for any fine or similar penalty paid to a government for any violation of the law.”).
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Criminal and Civil Liability
Statutes - Federal) Internal Revenue Code) IRC Section 162
Topics) Insurance) Environmental Insurance
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Civil Liability
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Corporate Disclosures
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Criminal Liability
Environmental Protection Agency
Accounting and Auditing Rules
|