|CALIFORNIA WATER NEWS|
Freeport Regional Water Project Dispute Resolved
To read this entire item of approximately 1000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
State Water Contractors, et al. v. East Bay Muni. Water Dist.; Kern County Water Agency et al., v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, et al.,
The East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), other federal water contractors, and the State Water Contractors (collectively, contractors) have settled state and federal lawsuits brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) challenging EBMUD’s amendatory supplemental water supply contract (amendatory contract) with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau).
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) National Environmental Policy Act) Environmental Impact Statements
Statutes - State) California) California Environmental Quality Act
Topics) Water Projects) Freeport Regional Diversion Project
California) Sacramento County
Eastern District of California
Bureau of Reclamation
East Bay Municipal Utility District
Kern County Water Agency, et al. v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
State Water Contractors, et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District