 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
February 2004
|
To read this entire item of approximately 750 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Holds that Liability Insurer Does Not Qualify as an Innocent Party under CERCLA
California Dep’t of Toxic Substances Control v. City of Chico
The federal District Court for the Eastern District of California held that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) does not allow an insurance company to impose joint and several liability against other potentially responsible parties (PRPs).
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) Contribution Actions
Topics) Insurance) Subrogation
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Groundwater
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Insurance
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) PCE
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Subrogation
California) All State
Eastern District of California
Department of Toxic Substances Control
California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. City of Chico
|