 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
January 2004
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1580 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
California Department of Transportation’s Transfer of Land, which Only Partially Lies within the Coastal Zone, to the Department of Parks and Recreation Does Not Offend the California Constitution
Citizens For Hatton Canyon v. California Dept. of Transportation
On October 17, 2003, the Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed a Monterey County Superior Court’s ruling granting summary judgment to the Department of Transportation (DOT) on the issue of whether it could sell approximately 130 acres of land to the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) for use as a state park.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - State) California) California Coastal Act
Statutes - State) California) California Park and Recreational Facilities Act
Topics) Land Use) Coastal Lands
California) Monterey County
6th District Court of Appeal
California Department of Parks and Recreation
California Department of Transportation
Coastal Commission
Citizens for Hatton Canyon v. California Dept. of Transportation
|