 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
January 2004
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1000 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
District Court Affirms Administrative Judge’s Refusal to Consider PRP’s Evidence and Grants EPA Pre-Judgment Interest and Potentially Court Costs
Titan Wheel Corporation of Iowa v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
On November 10, 2003 the federal District Court for the District of Iowa upheld penalties assessed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), against a hazardous waste generator. In so doing, the court found EPA’s assessment neither capricious, arbitrary nor excessive, and its decision implicity supports the tremendous discretion provided to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in the conduct of administrative proceedings below.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Statutes - Federal) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Administration
Statutes - Federal) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Civil Liability
Iowa) Walcott
Central District of Iowa
Army Corps of Engineers
Environmental Protection Agency
Titan Wheel Corporation of Iowa v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
|