 | | LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS |
January 2004
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1200 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
House Energy Bill’s MTBE Provisions: Industry “Gift Basket” or Congressional Apology?
In November, the U.S. Senate narrowly failed to bring the much-publicized House Energy Bill (HR 6) to a vote, although congressional leaders have promised to revive the bill when Congress reconvenes in January. As currently written, the bill’s most controversial provision would have exempted oil companies and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) manufacturers from liability for MTBE contamination clean-up costs. These provisions have the potential to significantly affect local governments and water districts by eliminating most present and all future litigation that seeks recovery of costs relating to MTBE contamination.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Bills and Legislation
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) MTBE
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Underground Storage Tanks
Topics) Water Quality) Bills and Proposed Legislation
|