 | | JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS |
October 2003
|
To read this entire item of approximately 865 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Ninth Circuit Rejects Challenges to Actions—and Inactions—of the Pacific Northwest’s Bonneville Power Administration
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation v. Bonneville Power Administration
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected various petitions by tribal and environmental organizations that challenged the extent to which the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) was complying with its statutory mandate to consider fish, wildlife, and power needs equitably in the Pacific Northwest.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - Federal) Administrative Procedures Act) General
Topics) Energy and Power) Bonneville Power Administration
Topics) Energy and Power) Endangered Species
Topics) Energy and Power) Hydroelectric Power
Oregon) All State
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Fish & Wildlife Service
NOAA Fisheries
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation v. Bonneville Power Administration
|
