 | | RECENT CALIFORNIA DECISIONS |
August/September 2003
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1500 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Landlord’s Notices to Rent Control Board Regarding Property’s Availability in Rental Market Did Not Insulate Landlord from Prior-Rents Scrutiny by Board
Santa Monica Rent Control Board v. Pearl Street, LLC, et al.
The Second District Court of Appeal recently held that the amount of rent charged by a landlord is a legitimate subject for judicial inquiry, regardless of whether the cause of action was triggered by the landlord’s filing of documents with the local rent control agency. The court found that the board’s lawsuit did not arise from the documents submitted to the board by defendant. Rather, the documents “triggered” the suit by bringing to light defendants’ activities prior to the filing of the documents.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Landlord and Tenant) Rent Control
Topics) Litigation) Notice
California) Santa Monica
2nd District Court of Appeal
Santa Monica Rent Control Board v. Pearl Street, LLC, et al.
|