 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
May 2003
|
To read this entire item of approximately 675 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Deodorizers May Be Considered Pollutants for Pollution Exclusion Purposes
Mark I Restoration SVC v. Assurance Company of America
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Pennsylvania has held that the pollution exclusion applies to deodorizers where those substances themselves cause contamination and injury.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Topics) Insurance) Pollution Exclusion
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Deodarizers
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Insurance
Pennsylvania) All State
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Mark I Restoration SVC v. Assurance Company of America
|
