 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
March 2003
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1685 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Third Circuit Establishes "Shocks the Conscience" Test for Land Use Based Substantive Due Process Claims
United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township of Warrington, PA, et al.
In a two-to-one opinion contradicting its own precedent, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently held, over a sharp dissent, that the proper standard for evaluating whether a town's Board of Supervisors violates a developer's substantive due process rights is whether the Supervisors' actions "shock the conscience."
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Due Process) Due Process
Topics) Land Use) Development Fees
Topics) Public Officials) Liability
Pennsylvania) Whitemarsh Township
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township of Warrington, PA, et al
|